Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (172670)	7/28/2009 9:19:30 PM
From: russet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 313060

China Teck Resources* (TCK.B : TSX : $26.28), Net Change: -0.17, % Change: -0.64%, Volume: 8,062,082 Japanese Yen ETF (FXY : NYSE : US$104.42), Net Change: -0.49, % Change: -0.47%, Volume: 55,971 SPDR China ETF (GXC : NYSE : US$68.34), Net Change: 0.71, % Change: 1.05%, Volume: 133,672 Madoff-like returns. The nonpartisan American Enterprise Institute (AEI.org) just issued an interesting report titled “China: Bogus Boom?” in which it analyzes China’s economic growth. On July 15, China reported a 7.9% GDP growth rate for Q2 2009, which is in line with its 8.0% goal and much better than the sharp decline felt in most of the rest of the world. This growth was credited to the December 2008 stimulus package worth about 14% of GDP. The stimulus package was targeted at boosting domestic demand as exports fell (down 21.2% in June). While the Morning Coffee has long been sceptical of official Chinese economic statistics, this AEI report highlights how the GDP calculations which do not necessarily represent the true state of the economy. China’s economic statistics are based on recorded production activity, rather than being a measure of expenditure growth—defined as the sum of consumption, investment, government spending, and net exports—as in the U.S. According to this article, the disbursal of funds is recorded as GDP growth. So the government can easily control the pace of official growth: “Funds disbursed for fixed-asset investment by state-owned enterprises or provincial governments are counted as having been spent when they are disbursed”. Under the same convention, “Shipments to retailers are counted as retail sales on the apparent assumption that ultimately all goods shipped will be sold at some point in the future”. Leading apparently to the situation where the government is essentially giving away washers and dryers to households which have no running water or electricity and recording this as economic growth. Given that the official numbers may bear little similarity to the actual economy, AEI looks at the central bank’s actual activities to infer what is actually going on. In June, growth in the money supply measure known as M2 surged to 28.5% year-over-year—up sharply from a 15% rate at the beginning of the year. New loans by banks rose 34.5% year-over-year in June from a 30.6% growth rate in May. Reading this, one could guess that Chinese policymakers are experiencing difficulties in prompting total spending to match their ambitious growth targets and are increasing money supply to stimulate demand. But somewhat counter productively, the resulting flood of money has flowed into stocks, property markets, commodity stockpiles, and consumer durables (with the help of special incentives for purchases of durables). The rest of the world’s economy has been working (or not working) furiously to cut inventories and costs since last year, which should make the recovery accelerate faster as inventories are rebuilt alongside growing demand. Any recovery in China could be muted, as increased demand just chews through existing inventory and as liquidity induced bubbles pop. Last week, John Mauldin highlighted in his weekly newsletter that 1 million tonnes of copper cathode inventory could be sitting in China which is not being counted in the global copper inventory levels. So could China be the one holding back the global economic growth as the world emerges from these doldrums while China is still chewing through inventory?