SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JakeStraw who wrote (16337)7/28/2009 4:28:09 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 103300
 
and lobbyists wining and dining our congress people



To: JakeStraw who wrote (16337)7/28/2009 5:14:51 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 103300
 
Re: "I think a progressive flat tax would be the way to go also."

A little bit of 'progressivity' in the new tax rates might be required (politically) to get reform passed at all.

But definitely, definitely deep-six every loophole in SIGHT.

For that is the only good way to both:

A) lower the rates, and

B) truly, structurally increase the long-term growth rate of our nation.

For example... WHY does our tax code encourage debt (but not all other forms of capital formation such as retained earnings [savings], equity issuance, etc. It makes no rational economic sense.

Re: "But gee what would happen to all those ever-so-useful tax attorney's, tax accountant's and our beloved IRS? ;^)"

Most of them might have to 'transition' to other forms of employment... and our nation would IMMEDIATELY, and every year there-after, benefit from the elimination of more then $300 Billion dollars a year in COMPLIANCE COSTS.

Add that up year-after-year, and pretty soon your got an economy growing MUCH FASTER then the near stagnant 1.5% rate we have (unfortunately) come to expect in recent years.

Maybe we won't be able to start growing as fast as 9% or 10% a year like emerging economies such as China and India have been doing for years now... but if we could just narrow the gap a bit, tack on an extra percentage point or two in real growth, that would make ALL THE DIFFERENCE.