Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mistermj who wrote (317183)	7/28/2009 10:08:19 PM
From: Little Joe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793958

I think the birthers are wrong for at least 2 reasons: 1. If there is a birth certificate in Hawaii, then he must have been born there. Hawaii would not issue a birth certificate for someone born in another state. 2. Even if he was born overseas, he was an American Citizen at birth by virtue of his being the son of an American Citizen, his mother. I suspect that there is something that is embarrasing in the birth certificate and that is what is being covered up. I cannot for the life of me imagine what it is, but I think they would just release the birth certificate if there was nothing to hide. lj