Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (499179)	7/29/2009 12:54:20 AM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577931

It was pretty clearly racial and it was pretty clear that Boxer was making it racial in spite of Alfords spoken intention to deal with expert research unbiased by race or partisan affiliation. "We’ve been looking at energy policy since 1996. And we are referring to the experts, regardless of their color. And for someone to tell me — an African-American, college-educated veteran of the United States Army — that I must contend with some other black group and put aside everything else in here. This has nothing to do with the NAACP, and really has nothing to do with the National Black Chamber of Commerce! We’re talking about energy. And that — that road the chair went down, I think is God awful." You are obviously willing to do what ever it takes to cover for a left wing partisan extremist who is caught using underhanded racial intimidation. Should I be surprised that you are able to find some black guy to say he didn't think Boxer was employing racism. After all according to you guys (mostly white men in the left wing) any black person who doesn't cowtow to the left wing is betraying their master, and you can't tolerate that. No surprises here and more and more black people are starting to say something doesn't smell right with these assumptions that they must go along with everything uttered from the left wing.