Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (16360)	7/29/2009 9:37:15 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	1 Recommendation Respond to of 103300

Even IF it were actually true, humankind has nothing to do with global weather patterns... were cavemen driving around in SUV's the last time we had global warming 100,000 years ago? Listen, if you REALLY wanted to stop the production of excess carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, then stop the jungle clearing in Brazil, they're cutting down the jungle forests at breakneck speed (about 40 acres an hour), those trees consume the world's carbon dioxide and create oxygen for the entire planet... for anyone to pay an additional tax for some anemic hope of stopping excess carbon production while the forests are still being eliminated is completely missing the point, is hopelessly counterproductive, continues to aggravate the original problem, and is absolutely schizophrenic... The problem: Excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere The solution: End the destruction of the oxygen producing forests GZ

To: puborectalis who wrote (16360)	7/29/2009 10:07:06 AM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

the UN report lololol. 70% of the UN is dictatorships or commies who hate the west and will do any thing to slow up Capitalism. The Reds control the green movement, wake up

To: puborectalis who wrote (16360)	7/29/2009 11:20:47 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

If we just let the elderly die without treatment we could save a lot of money... a quarter of all Medicare spending is made in a patient's final year of life, and that's when the biggest potential savings could be made, so why piss it away on the eldery... if the person is just a useless bag of skin and he's going to die anyway, don't treat him, just let him die... that's obama's plan... foxnews.com GZ