Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (499352)	7/29/2009 12:48:13 PM
From: bentway	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578731

"I would think given some evidence that the majority of those questioning his birth would be satisfied." Like what, Eric? These morons will NEVER be satisfied. If you don't believe the (R) governor of the state that issued the certificate, who WILL they believe?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (499352)	7/29/2009 1:50:46 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578731

I see......you think we should be questioning whether Obama was born in the US or not as well. They raise an interesting question and I hope for legislation to require documentation in future elections so this issue never reoccurs. As for Obama himself - I suspect he was born in Hawaii - for the life of me I cannot see what information we could learn that he sees fit to hide. For a guy that boasts about transparency I find it rather amusing. Is there a chance the true unbelievers will find something to keep nibbling on - perhaps - does it matter - probably not. I would think given some evidence that the majority of those questioning his birth would be satisfied. Why is the certificate of live birth insufficient for you? Why do you question this president when no president has been questioned on this issue in my life?