SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (7857)7/29/2009 1:21:08 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Listen I know you are invested in the status quo

Nothing could be further from the truth. I just don't think you can have a serious proposal without certain features (e.g., tort reform) or with certain features (e.g., a "government" option). It is relatively simple to list out ten or so modifications to our current system that would improve it and/or reduce costs, none of which involve a government option.

There will be a health care reform bill passed this year... the question is what it contains.

I don't doubt it. When you install an extremist liberal president, accompanied by overwhelming majorities in both houses of congress, you're going to get some very destructive legislation.

Hopefully, the pressure from independents and Rs will save the country from this liberal extremism, but it looks to me like it could go either way at this point.



To: Road Walker who wrote (7857)7/29/2009 3:17:10 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
the folks on the right ought to be offering constructive ideas.

I can't believe you said that. There are lots of constructive ideas from the right--they just don't fit the dominant narrative so are responded to as non-constructive.

I absolutely agree that health care benefits in lieu as salary should be taxed as salary. Have posted many times here that we got into this mess in large part because they weren't.