Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hank2010 who wrote (66507)	7/29/2009 3:47:45 PM
From: Nevada9999	Respond to of 78410

It says multiple northerly trending feeder structures in the east-west trending zone, so it's OK. A good map would be nice, though. I haven't had time to look for one.

To: hank2010 who wrote (66507)	7/29/2009 6:21:56 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Respond to of 78410

I understand what you are saying and I agree. But keep in mind that historical drilling was done across strike from what they say and confirmed the presence of gold. We will see what Hole 003 gives us. This one was NorthWest..more or less across strike. In these two new holes they hit reasonably high grade given that historical holes had grade of 1.2-1.4 g/t gold. So we have across strike holes with lower grade and on strike holes with grades almost twice as high. This is in the main zome which was believed to average 1.2 g/t. They didn't hit the super high grades because these holes where drill several hundred meters from where those channel samples returned the higher grades. This excerpt from a previous release: Detailed follow-up is continuing to the north and south along strike of the high-grade exposure where several gold-rich channels, including 125.9 grams per tonne gold over 23 metres and 19.15 grams per tonne gold over eight metres I conclude that the channels were on strike but that they got high values over a certain width across strike. However this statement in italic is confusing, so I could be wrong.