Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (317481)	7/30/2009 7:45:34 AM
From: FJB	4 Recommendations Respond to of 793843

I would bet everything I own that I score 30 points higher than Obama on any IQ test.

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (317481)	7/30/2009 8:19:10 AM
From: Oral Roberts	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793843

"Eau Claire [Wisconsin] is a big important state." I was unaware that I lived in a big important state. I guess that gets us to 51, we just need to find his other 6.

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (317481)	7/30/2009 8:46:48 AM
From: Bearcatbob	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793843

I do not give a flip about one's IQ. It is wisdom and judgement that count.

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (317481)	7/30/2009 9:17:07 AM
From: Geoff Altman	7 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793843

I do not believe that someone with such a consistently weak understanding of economics, history, and the guiding legal document of our nation and its language merited admission to Columbia University or Harvard law school. Nor can I imagine how anyone could have merited graduation from these institutions (let alone edited the Harvard Law Review, the most prestigious legal publication of its kind) with these deficiencies. That makes Obama the poster child for affirmative action. Is it any wonder that they've got all his college papers locked away somewhere? I'm a bit more cynical than the author. Obama may be a Constitutional lawyer but whereas most would study the Constitution and marvel at its checks and balances, Obama IMO studied it to find all the weaknesses with the intent of using them to further negate the document. He's more likely to view its repressive effects on Gov't as a bad thing.... I mean, how can we follow the new rights of FDRs constitution without destroying the old one?