SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69643)7/30/2009 2:09:16 PM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224713
 
Obama is president and he is tripling or better the debt.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69643)7/30/2009 2:21:43 PM
From: Alan Smithee2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224713
 
Pssssst. Kenneth.

News Flash!

George Bush isn't the president any more.

Time to move on, man, time to move on.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69643)7/30/2009 2:42:34 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie4 Recommendations  Respond to of 224713
 
When George Bush took office at the beginning of 2001, the federal government was running a substantial budget surplus and projected rising surpluses "as far as the eye could see." Now, the United States is facing massive current deficits -- as a share of the economy, the largest since World War II -- and an increasingly dire and unsustainable outlook over the next 10 years and beyond.

In 2001, the Congressional Budget Office projected that the 2008 budget would show a surplus equal to 4.5% of gross domestic product. The actual 2008 budget ran a deficit of 3.2% of GDP.


This is a load of crap. there was no surplus. There was a shell game where the government took funds from Social Security to pay down public debt, but there was always a budget deficit during Clinton's presidency. The budget deficit did decrease through most of Clinton's presidency due mainly to people paying more money into Social Security because of the dotcom boom. But as would be expected, when the bubble burst (under Clinton's watch), the deficit started to increase. Clinton handed over an economy that had about a $130Billion deficit.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69643)7/30/2009 2:48:16 PM
From: Saulamanca6 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224713
 
The Myth of the Clinton Surplus

craigsteiner.us

The Myth of the Clinton Surplus, Part II

craigsteiner.us



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69643)7/30/2009 3:56:00 PM
From: jlallen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224713
 
Kenny boy...why do you post such obvious nonsense...?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69643)7/30/2009 4:06:36 PM
From: chartseer2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224713
 
Oh bummer! At worst bailout could cost 24 trillion. But who is counting?

msnbc.msn.com

comrade chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (69643)7/30/2009 7:35:30 PM
From: tonto3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224713
 
We of course know that the country was going into a recession at that time and those projections were false.

You did learn that one can not actually project that far ahead with certainty in your several econ courses, didn't you?