SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (7950)7/31/2009 1:44:56 PM
From: skinowski3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Public option would never fail -- it would be deemed "Too Important to Fail".

Besides, at least in the beginning it would be relatively generous both to patients and to providers. After they gain enough standing, they'd tighten the screws. Moreover, just like with Medicare, even people who at first opposed it soon became dependent on the nice big government checks. Same would happen with the new entity.



To: Lane3 who wrote (7950)8/3/2009 4:26:14 PM
From: Peter Dierks1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
The government takeover of healthcare will result in rationing. Are you comfortable with the timing of your death being caused by withholding care that you would otherwise have received?



To: Lane3 who wrote (7950)8/13/2009 3:16:59 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
And if it doesn't, then "they" were right and you and I were wrong.

Not if it does (out competes the private plans) because of government subsidies, guarantees, or other form of assistance or advantage.