Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (500955)	8/4/2009 9:44:30 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575454

Is that house bill the final bill?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (500955)	8/4/2009 9:46:29 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575454

BTW, why did the ultra conservative AMA and drug maker lobby group PhRMA endorse the bill? Are they socialist?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (500955)	8/4/2009 11:15:35 AM
From: Little Joe	4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575454

I have verified that your comments relating to keeping existing coverage are correct by reading the original house version of the bill. They are flat out lying when they claim you will be able to keep existing coverage. I have read but nor verified that similar language is included in all of the Dem proposals. On the other hand the Reps are lying when they claim that the end of life counseling is mandatory. The bill I read only creates such counseling as an additional benefit and is not mandatory. You can't believe either side. They are pathetic in this game of lie, cheat and steal. lj