To: KLP who wrote (318395 ) 8/5/2009 12:51:09 PM From: skinowski 5 Recommendations Respond to of 793782 During the Great Depression of the 1930s, agricultural price support programs led to vast amounts of food being deliberately destroyed at a time when malnutrition was a serious problem in the United States and hunger marches were taking place in cities across the country. For example, the federal government bought 6 million hogs in 1933 alone and destroyed them. Huge amounts of farm produce were plowed under, in order to keep it off the market and maintain prices at the officially fixed level, and vast amounts of milk were poured down the sewers for the same reason. Meanwhile, many American children were suffering from diseases caused by malnutrition. –Thomas Sowell, Basic Economics (3rd Edition, Basic Books, 2007), p. 56. I knew about this program, but Sowell puts it in simple and stark terms. This was criminal stupidity on the part of the government. Roosevelt and his circle of political and economic "experts" thought that the way to combat deflation was to support high prices and to insist on high salaries. The former led to programs like destroying food... the latter helped keep unemployment high. Who would start hiring workers at mandated high salaries during periods of economic decline and uncertainty? Today's measures are not any better. Taxing and redistributionist schemes (CO2 tax, bailouts, clunkers, various RE price supports, etc.) are a drain on productive citizens - and will only increase the degree of unpredictability. Investors are used to dealing with whims of the markets, but not many know what new schemes may pop up at any time out of left field in Washington. Now, the same [type of] people who brought us food destruction programs - as well as all those recent "big ideas" - claim that they can take over healthcare - and manage it from top and all the way down to specific individual doctor - patient interactions. Not only will they make a mess of it, but - perhaps, more importantly - allowing government to become so huge is a fundamentally un-American idea. Europe has a long tradition of strong, central governance - and over the centuries their centralized systems of government - time after time - kept deteriorating (or, perhaps, naturally evolving?) into empires and dictatorships. Believing that big government makes things better is... dancing with the Devil. I hope we don't go there, but it looks like we will. Good luck to us all -- we'll need it.