SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (502086)8/6/2009 4:21:02 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574002
 
>> Life expectancy is an important metric for measuring the success of a health care system in ANY country.

Only for those who don't understand anything about the matter.

It is an ignorant argument.

If you want to talk about life expectancy after being treated for particular cancers or AIDs, that's different. Or life expectancy after a particular surgery.

But life expectancy of the population at large is influenced to a greater extent by 100s of other factors like where a person lives than by the quality of our health care system.

You're too stupid to have this discussion. Take it up with tejek or Shepard, who are both about on your intellectual level.



To: bentway who wrote (502086)8/8/2009 12:48:51 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1574002
 
Life expectancy is an important metric for measuring the success of a health care system in ANY country. To claim otherwise is just moronic.

Inode is boxed into a corner on this one and can't figure out how to get out.