Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (18498)	8/6/2009 5:17:48 PM
From: dvdw©	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50040

Has everything to do with your comment. Your words " You are right, the right has organized and their intention is to hijack any kind of open discussion on health care." When I stated what i did, I pointed out that these congress folks accepted what the unelected lobbyists and political propagandists put out without debate or input, and then these same folks could not even defend the bill against legitimate protestor concerns, because as a member said, they had no obligation to read a 1000 page bill, instead, against all logic, they'd just hurry it through. If the protests did not occur, then the bill will have sailed through without any discussion whatsoever, and the entire American population would be forced to deal with a bill written by an unidentified 3rd party who was not elected to represent voter or the majority interests of NON voters in any way shape or form. and you need a reason beyond this awareness, to posit why so many folks are outraged? Your claim the right is behind the outrage manifested in the town halls, has no proof accept that is the same position main streams medias posturing about the protesters being part of the right wing cabal. Knowing you had no proof and brought that argument forward, it makes everything you write suspect. After reviewing your posting history you appeared as a libertarian, a fence stradler, supposedly objective, but its just as likely, your not.