Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Madharry who wrote (35046)	8/8/2009 2:09:15 PM
From: Paul Senior	1 Recommendation Respond to of 78748

Madharry, although I reduce my positions in natural gas stocks, I am maintaining positions in limited partnerships that are involved with transmission and storage. For companies that work on the wells, I have ESA, active on the East Coast. "Energy Services of America (ESA) and Shale Natural Gas" Subject 57548 Since "Shale Natural Gas" was added to the thread topic, the thread's become much more active. ---- I don't understand how an adviser could say be 100% out of the market to somebody who I presume has enough assets to be in the market in the first place. Of course, I don't know the client's risk tolerance or his/her/their asset base or income requirements. The Graham way seems more advisable to me (although I haven't followed it myself -g-) --- shifting from bonds to stocks when the stock market is low; moving monies from stocks to bonds when the market is high. 25-75 being the percentages at the extremes.