Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (502845)	8/8/2009 7:27:56 PM
From: steve harris	2 Recommendations Respond to of 1575148

Walmarts mean jobs, jobs that would reduce the democrats' voting block of welfare recipients... "votes"

To: Brumar89 who wrote (502845)	8/8/2009 8:09:15 PM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575148

>>> I've never lived anywhere people objected to a walmart. I would not live in a city that objected to a Walmart. These places -- NYC, Chicago, LA -- who wants to live in these places? Are there any places where they don't want Walmart that aren't far left Meccas?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (502845)	8/10/2009 4:16:16 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575148

4 in Seattle metro area, there's four in Spring TX alone - pop 37K per wikipedia. Thanks for making my point. As for encountering opposition, that's pretty normal for any development in Seattle. Probably that seems strange to someone like you who has never seen a development he doesn't love. I've never lived anywhere people objected to a walmart. When they've come to small towns where I've lived near, people were delighted. Man, you're on a roll today. Thanks for making my second point.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (502845)	8/10/2009 4:55:22 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575148

I've never lived anywhere people objected to a walmart. Try Yelm, Wa - walmart.bravenewtheaters.com Even the ACLU got involved (a little) on the right side for once: ACLU Challenges 'Speak No Wal-Mart' Policy Posted on: Friday, 8 July 2005, 12:00 CDT YELM, Wash. -- A speak-no-Wal-Mart policy in town council meetings is getting a challenge from the American Civil Liberties Union. Aaron H. Caplan, an ACLU lawyer in Seattle, has written Yelm Mayor Adam Rivas and council members that the group believes it is unconstitutional to prohibit any mention of Wal-Mart or big-box stores in general at council meetings. The policy has been increasingly restrictive over the past five months. No one who signs up to talk about big-box stores, much less Wal-Mart, at a council meeting is allowed to talk, anyone who mentions either is told to sit down. Municipal attorney Brent F. Dille said council members were fed up with complaints about Wal-Mart's application to build a superstore and demands for a moratorium on big-box stores. He also said officials don't want to appear biased if the council is presented with an appeal of Wal-Mart's application. Caplan wrote that no law requires the council to forbid all mention of the issue at its meetings. "The ability of citizens to state their views about matters of public concern is one of the cornerstones of a free and accountable government," he wrote. "Yelm's practice of silencing public comment violates that principle." [ Seems timely :-) ] Federal court rulings cited by Caplan don't apply to Yelm, Rivas argued. "Everything they list in there comes from court cases in other states that have nothing to do with Washington state and the appearance of fairness act that we're trying to uphold," the mayor said. "For the most part, we feel fairly confident in what we're doing and the steps that we're taking." Rivas does not expect any change in policy as the result of the letter and doesn't plan to answer it, despite Caplan's request for a response this month. "We don't answer to the ACLU," Rivas said. The ACLU is not planning a lawsuit over the issue, spokesman Doug Honig said. Dille said he had been in touch with Caplan and the ACLU seemed willing to accept a ban on discussion of Wal-Mart but felt the latest policy was excessive. Dille would not comment to The Olympian about a parallel ban on the use of the word moratorium. "I wasn't at that (council) meeting," he said.