Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (26861)	8/10/2009 11:13:49 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

Oh, NOW you want to discuss it... after you've misrepresented what I said in an attempt to discredit the very idea.... OK. <The statements you make are founded on the shared understanding of words and if you care to look, (which you refuse to do) are absolute in nature.> The statements one makes come from his OWN IDEA of his understanding of what the words mean... and while they may be absolute in nature (God), they are far from absolute in ones mind. "Pine Tree" means differing things to each person depending on what they look like in their environment, which animals they see living in them, pictures they've seen, emotions attached to interactions with them or their parents interactions... etc etc etc. Further, you seem to be implying that everyone has an absolute understanding of nature?? Non-sensical it seems, please clarify. This is all obvious, and therefore the second part of your accusation seems to fit perfectly... if you look in the mirror: So..... either your statement is wrong, or you are the equivalent of a jabbering mental patient. DAK