SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tom pope who wrote (123169)8/10/2009 12:13:36 PM
From: LoneClone  Respond to of 206323
 
Re the pipeline to Kitimat, IMO LNG would face less opposition than oil. The way I understand it, unlike with oil where the major problems is spillage into the ocean, the major concern with LNG is catastrophic explosions, which could be dealt with by locating the port and pipeline away from settled areas.

That is not to say there wouldn't still be considerable opposition, but IMO you would have a much better chance of getting permitted for LNG than for oil tankers.

LC


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News