Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andrew N. Cothran who wrote (70221)	8/10/2009 10:18:42 AM
From: MJ	Respond to of 224724

Just one person's opinion: You can agree or disagree, and this person may even change their opinion. Disclaimer, mj. COMMENT: In reference to Rick Ackerman's article www.hiddenpivotenterprises.com article/comments. Ackerman made the point that Obama could become a lame duck President. In response, even if Obama becomes a lame duck President, there is always someone who will fill the void or someones. Obama's big problem is that he knew what he wanted, a Socialist society, and he and his non-elected Czars that surround him decided to push as fast as they could to accomplish this. Likely they believed that Americans would not rise to question their agenda. Were they ever wrong----Americans are rising to question the actions of the Obama and his Czars. Such an action happened over the weekend as Americans called in to the socialist Move.On organizations interview. WHITHER MOVE.ON.ORG Make no mistake Move.On is still giving Obama support for whatever Obama is presently wanting. This was obvious as I listened to a weekend call-in show with Move.On.Org on C-Span. The Move.On spokeswoman obviously did not expect Americans to take the organization to task. Americans did with little support coming in from the left for Move.On's positions. The callers were "balanced" with first a socialist and then a new-era caller in the fashion of the Reagan supporters of the 1970's and 1980's. When Move On's rep was ask why Move.On was not focusing on opposing the war in Afghanistan and Iraq. The answer was------we focused on that in the campaign that is what our people were concerned about. Now we are focusing on passing Obama's Health bills which is what our people are concerned about now. Oh my, so now Move.On has no concern for wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan and Iraq and other possible wars coming-----I ask why? Is it because these are Obama's wars? WHERE IS OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE When ask about the birth certificate-----the spokeswoman for Move.On bashed thinking, educated American citizens who want the facts. This is a technique known as "if you don't like the message attack the messenger". After bashing other Americans came the response--------a paraphrase of Move.On's response--- ----- 'if the long form birth certificate is produced they (the messengers) will go to another question surrounding his birth.') Move.On took the position of bashing the messengers while not joining the call to produce Mr. Obama's credentials to be POTUS. Why should they join the call for transparency? If the long form certificate proves fictional, not factual----their emperor will have shed his clothes for all to see. Of course they have a vested interest as they played a major role in raising funds and getting him elected so why should this political action group care about such minor things as credentials? Hmmm----wonder, does that imply that they know that the long form birth certificate is insufficient evidence for him to be POTUS? (That was a messenger attack!) mj