SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LLCF who wrote (26877)8/10/2009 8:59:52 PM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
My "assertion" stands... what about it?

"Actually" It's self contradicting, that's what.

"The foul was you inserted that I thought my "assertion" was actually some universal or ultimate statement of truth despite my DIRECT contradictory statement that was part of that statement..."

Of course even your second sentence began with "therefore" indicating it was based on the premise that the first sentence was TRUE. The first sentence began with "Actually" Which you refused to acknowledge as a statement about the actual state of reality. So...Which is it? Do you know that no one can know, or not?

Usually, animals will not defecate where they sleep; but you are an exception, and have laid a large and smelly turd in the middle of your own argument. If you want to continue to claim that all your statements have no force of truth outside of your own delusional and muddy thinking, then I suppose all that is left is to take up an offering and get you some proper meds. Beyond that; all meaningful communication is impossible. Can you GROK that DUDE?



To: LLCF who wrote (26877)8/10/2009 9:42:13 PM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 28931
 
The original post was titled "Absolute Relativism" and all it did was point out that a common Atheistic argument against Christianity (Argument from Evil) is wielded by people who expressly claim that Good and Evil do not exist. You didn't bother responding to that post at all except to demonstrate the same type of irrational thought process.

I do know this much absolutely. (Although this is a canard that you have interjected and is not directly related to the substance of the post in question)

Self contradictory statements cannot be both true and untrue at the same time and in the same way.

That's called logic. Why don't you try it?

plato.stanford.edu