Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (503731)	8/11/2009 8:54:34 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575598

>>Europe wasn't going to deal with Iraq and we were stuck dealing with them ever since the first Gulf war. Should have removed Saddam then. << Sun Tzu would send you along with Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld to the firing squad for your terrible military strategy. Here is how I think Sun Tzu would have thought of iraq: Europe has a very large muslim population and IS within missle distance of Iraq and all of the middle east. So sooner or later Europe would need to deal with them saving us the expense. Sun Tzu would have seen this and given them litle thought. He owuld have let Europe worry about them. they were not a serious danger. Any of those countries. No good military leader would fail to see that. That is pretty obvious military logic. So Sun Tzu would instead have spent his military resources on concentrating on his real dangers, an increasingly despotic Putin/Russia (Bush loved Putin, remember, he looked into his soul?) and concentrated on China and Russia and certainly would not have borrowed money from them!! Make sense to you yet?