SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (26898)8/12/2009 12:00:39 PM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
Hi Koan I'm not sure how you got "No, athiests are simply saying they don't believe in a god." out of my post. The review I posted, dealt specifically with the argument from evil used by a certain Atheist who first claimed Evil does not exist. Yes: it is a common tactic and yes: it is demonstratively self contradictory.

To positively assert that Good and Evil do not "actually" exist, and then turn around in the next breath and use Good and Evil to attack Christianity is self defeating rhetoric. Nothing more.

"They are not saying they know there is no god, or that it has anything to do with evil."

Sure they are: and they do so on a regular basis.

"That the claim of gods is like a claim there are unicorns.
Until I see a horn, there is no way I can believe, using logic!!"

First: no one claims that unicorns have actual existence so that's s silly example. Second: Do you need to "SEE" everything before you believe logically. What does that mean for blind people? Are they prevented from believing in the Sun? If you are talking about sense perception in general: how do you establish sense perception as the only criteria for truth. I suppose I should also ask you what 2+2 is in your universe as well.

"All athiests are saying is, show me the evidence and I will change my mind."

It's been my experience that those kind of Atheists are very few and far between. Although, Tony Flew may be an exception to the general rule.

amazon.com



To: koan who wrote (26898)8/12/2009 1:00:43 PM
From: LLCF  Respond to of 28931
 
I never understood athiests as it appears they reject any possibility of god... which makes no sense from a scientific viewepoint. BUT, I think really what they are rejecting (how could one reject anything else?) is THIER idea of God... probably the one described on this header. Can't blame them for that.

dAK