SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (38306)10/29/1997 4:51:00 PM
From: mp  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
That is really telling it like it is! But I guess some people
just like born losers like AMD better than trail blazers like
Intel! Well, it takes all kinds!



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (38306)10/29/1997 5:00:00 PM
From: William Hunt  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 186894
 
TO ALL IS INTEL OVERVALUED AT 80 DOLLARS PER SHARE ? BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING IT PROBABLY IS !
1) Earnings decreasing this year -defintely not on an upward trend - should be down in fourth qtr due to decrease sales in flash memory market
2) DEC settlement - evidently INTEL did not tell the truth or why did we pay 700 million dollars in extortion ?
3) Management does not seem to be able to relay their strategy to WALL STREET - no reference to T.K.- he is not the only analyst that is negative on the company - as shareholders this is a responsibility of every company management to do this well
4) Press releases this summer have been very ambigious at best - very poor distribuition of information for a twenty five billion dollar company
5) Why does the company need 11 billion dollars of cash in the bank ? Why not buy back shares if they cannot find a better buy in the market ? A 5% money market is a very poor return
6) PII marketing campaign is very sad - the only thing my son likes is the cool van but this does not sell computers !
7) Very poor anticipation of the ramp up of MMX thIs year - started the company behind the eight ball and defintely effected earnings with the disposal of the classic pentium

ISSUES
1) Sub 1000-pc - how is the company addressing this market ?
2) MERCED a positive -but a year and a half away from effecting earnings
3) What is going to drive earning until then to increase shareholder value ?

I have own the stock for the past two years and presently own 6000 INTCW - just looking for answers for what is going to make INTEL grow ? Something has change in the last six months with INTEL and the company doe not seems to be operating on all cylinders ?The real value of the stock should be 68 dollars per share based upon a P/E of 15 and 3.83 per share and declining earnings.

Looking for some honest feedback on what is going to make the earnings and stock grow in 1998

BEST WISHES
BILL
.



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (38306)10/29/1997 7:11:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 186894
 
Mary - Re: "Don't tell me AMD is priceless because it has no earnings."

Well said!

Because AMD is very often in the "dumper", many AMD supporters often site the enormous "upside" potential of AMD's stock.

That's one advantage of being beaten down!

Paul



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (38306)10/30/1997 2:17:00 AM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Mary, re: Tom Kurlak

Why do you crucify this man? He lowered his opinion (to hold, I think) right before Intel dived.

Petz



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (38306)10/30/1997 11:29:00 AM
From: Tom Kearney  Respond to of 186894
 
Mary, I agree with you. Let's all get together and go kick Tom Kurlack in the ass!

Regards,
(A different) TK