Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (26921)	8/13/2009 8:57:40 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

>>An actual infinite regress of causes in the physical universe is impossible because the material universe is finite.<< All the scientific evidences points to an infinite universe, not a finite universe. >.The buck has to stop somewhere and where it stops is at the uncreated self existent being that we call God.>> That is nuts, do you know that? "uncreated self existent being" That is pure psychobable and means nothing. Those are just words. A scientist has to ask the logical questions of god: 1) What is an uncreated being? 2) Is this existent being infinite? 3) And how is it that there is an uncreated god. Why not an uncreated infinite universe? Even more easy to believe because there is science pointing to infinity and something coming out of nothing, because the HUP says there can be no nothing.