Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (505345)	8/16/2009 8:11:01 PM
From: tejek	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577191

This is the reason you're a salesman. You are totally challenged when it comes to anything analytical, no matter how simple. You are being totally illogical and intentionally looking for his Achilles heel in order to put him down. Not only is it unfair but its a mean form of bullying. Its BS and is meaningless. Stop it! You have accomplished nothing.

To: i-node who wrote (505345)	8/16/2009 10:33:10 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577191

Don't ever consider yourself analytical.....I've heard enough of you to determine you're a fake......a four function fake. Stick to the 1040EZ's....

To: i-node who wrote (505345)	8/17/2009 9:06:23 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577191

No, it didn't, but that's beside the point -- the point is that even if you COULD save money on one individual in a thousand, the cost of testing of the other 999 would outweigh it. You are thinking about prevention in a very narrow bean counter way...i posted a ton on data that should give you pause for thought about prevention in terms other than MRIs and CAT scans and other expensive testing procedures...by the way why would I expect a "conservative" to to have any empathy for the human aspects of preventive care? Al