Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (36372)	8/17/2009 2:14:43 PM
From: Peter Dierks	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

So far the evidence amounts to a few sympathetic journalists that were shown what was represented as a certificate of live birth. If it was genuine it was not legally significant. There is a statement from the Hawaiian official who could have cleared it up. His statement essentially said nothing that undermined the suspicion that Obama is an illegal alien. Obama hired lawyers for hundreds of thousands of dollars to obscure his college records. The whole thing looks fishy to anyone who has an ounce of skepticism in their mind. As I posted before if you have any evidence, post it. The SCOTUS chose to avoid becoming the issue when they declined to review the cases, but a double negative does not logically mean a positive. If anything they would have ruled if it would have cleared Obama, the fact they did not implies that he is not legally competent to be POTUS. (Perhaps this is why he leans so heavily on the TOTUS?)