Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (23716)	10/29/1997 6:12:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

But I am quite content to go back to lurking having left here a dated and archived record that, imho, IPM shows all the signs of being a scam. Will you be just as happy to come back and apologize when it turns out that you're wrong? Will you admit the mistake when boasting of all the scams you've pointed out? I know Mr. Charters won't.

To: marcos who wrote (23716)	10/29/1997 6:14:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

marcos: I do not think IPMCF is a scam, at least it does not appear to have the typical scam colors. It might involves error in judgment of management if it turns out that the gold and PGM are not cost effectively extractable. But I do not think management or anyone else, for that matter, knows that at this time. One of the main reasons, during the whole year that I have been following the ups and downs of this stock, I have not seen insider selling. In a scam the insiders are looking for an exit strategy, but the only one that benefited from the rise to 14 earlier this year were the shorts. Marcos, if you want to discuss the pro and con of IPMCF off thread, I would be happy to comply, just send me an e-mail. I have made my reservations and my adulations to some of management's capabilities noted on this thread and I see no reason to repeat these for all that have already read these. Furthermore, the "negative chatter" is already reaching levels seen only few times before, often just before a major new buying opportunity. You should know (as I presume most of the thread does) that I have traded and will (hopefully) trade this stock again. Zeev

To: marcos who wrote (23716)	10/29/1997 6:18:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Marcos: Would you mind sharing with us what in your vast experience leads you to believe that IPM shows all the signs of being a scam? Or perhaps you are just trying to get back to .500 in recognizing them? From what I can see, you are currently batting .000. techstocks.com

To: marcos who wrote (23716)	10/29/1997 6:56:00 PM
From: Matt C. Austin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

I think you are the same Marcos that was a bull on Naxos stock a few months ago and now you think IPM is a scam. You're starting to sound like Stuffy -- the 'Ace Bloomberg Sleuth.' You folks sure go thru some elaborate machinations to make a few dollars.