Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Kensington Resources Ltd. (V.KRT) * Diamond in the rough! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Miles who wrote (638)	10/29/1997 8:57:00 PM
From: Leigh McBain	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5206

There seems to be an awful lot of energy being expended on bashing a stock that is getting beat on pretty effectively, without the help. I have to admit the glut of people willing to spend their time here slamming the stock, slamming other investors, etc. is getting to be rather ridiculous. Would any of the prime combatants care to identify the reason why the rest of us are being forced to wade thru your ramblings, if you truly think so little of KRT. Even if it is the area that you find so interesting (I believe that was you, Orvado) then why not spend your time on a thread discussing the area under the umbrella of a stock you think has merit. Orvado, some of your actual points may even be accurate, but you hide most of them so well, in the acid tongue approach, that there is little wonder you are not given any credit for them. I can also comment on at least one post you made a short time ago with regards to a uranium property of JNN's and a "trade" with Cameco that was based on very little (read "NO") fact. This does NOT help your credibility. Miles, I suggest that you continue to post whatever you can find out, and as long as you are capable of backing it up with items such as a useable phone number (I have not yet, but will verify it's authenticity myself, as you suggested) then you will be an asset to the thread. I would suggest that the long winded "how dare you" postings are somewhat meaningless in an environment such as this. The words being hurled your direction are best deflected by continuing to post constructive useful information as it becomes available. I do speak from experience, having been harassed in a similar fashion with regards to Westrend, some time back. They too were being touted as going under, being delisted, etc. At the time they were trading at .10, today they around .70 and rising. I am NOT telling everyone just to hold and all will be fine, I do not know that. I also do not know that that is not the case. The company has made some mistakes (some BIG ones) however, at the moment they live to try again. Let's wait and see what happens with the feedback from the bulk samples. Salut, Leigh McBain

To: Miles who wrote (638)	10/29/1997 9:13:00 PM
From: ORVADO	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5206

Great we know two things now! 1) Miles is a tattle-tail and 2) and KRT hired someone part-time.

To: Miles who wrote (638)	10/31/1997 9:16:00 AM
From: maxed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5206

Hi. Miles. Great work on getting the facts on KRT. Since your info was verified by other people no one has attacked you. The truth is a great weapon. Beats the hell out of what people hear on the street. If they would have made a simple phone call like you they would not have made fools out of themselves. But some people have their own reasons for KRT to fail. Their biggest enemy is the truth. But keep your guard up because they or others will be back as soon as good news is released. Go KRT. They hate it when we say that. Eddy.