SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (506966)8/21/2009 12:24:38 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576593
 
>> they wouldn't cut people for being sick.

This is, of course, a big lie.

What happens, in reality, is that the insurance or plan "pool" in which he/she participates, becomes tremendously expensive, as healthy people move to cheaper insurance, leaving only sick people in the pool.

If you want REAL, MEANINGFUL reform, this is the problem that must be addressed, and Obama's "plan" doesn't touch it. You've got to have some way of guaranteeing that every pool will either (a) be comprised of a mix of sick & healthy, OR (b) premiums for the sick are mitigated in some other way.

This is the CENTRAL coverage-related problem that needs to be addressed, and it isn't in any of the planned legislation. The so-called "government option" is a non-starter and will not be part of any plan, so it isn't a factor. You must find a way for private insurance companies to deal with this problem.



To: SilentZ who wrote (506966)8/21/2009 1:00:09 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576593
 
Z, > If that really were the case, they wouldn't cut people for being sick.

Swing and a miss.

> They merge for the same reasons the financial companies do; larger companies = higher executive pay and more market power.

Foul ball.

Including that stupid MSNBC puff piece about "exploding health insurance profits," that's two strikes.

Count is 0-2 ... ;-)

Tenchusatsu