SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (53910)8/22/2009 3:37:48 PM
From: Gib Bogle  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217750
 
Hey, don't knock Wikipedia! There's good stuff there. Not all equally reliable, of course.



To: carranza2 who wrote (53910)8/22/2009 4:44:43 PM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217750
 
About 20% of the money was only for projects that could start construction within 90 days eligibility for funding from the $90 billion set aside for infrastructure.

As you know: $310 billion in tax breaks for businesses and the middle class was to avoid impact on businesses and poverty alleviating scheme.

Still my point is: do not expect much from the plan to be an engine for growth and stop decline that you mentioned in your posting.

There is no wayy return to natural size can be stopped.



To: carranza2 who wrote (53910)8/22/2009 4:51:29 PM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217750
 
Take Elroy's CA: Stimulus funds in California mostly go to routine projects, study says,

California had one of the highest unemployment rates in the nation in June at 11.6%, and economists anticipate it to remain in the same ballpark when the latest numbers are released today.

In fact, much of the stimulus money earmarked for California so far has gone toward run-of-the-mill projects such as replacing a metal guardrail with a concrete one in the city of Orange and conducting a campus-wide elevator study at the Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital in San Francisco

latimes.com