SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (507549)8/24/2009 11:24:57 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578494
 
Oh this is going to be amusing (NOT!):

Shiite groups announce new alliance minus Iraqi PM
By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA, Associated Press Writer Qassim Abdul-zahra, Associated Press Writer
1 hr 54 mins ago

BAGHDAD – Major Shiite groups have formed a new alliance that will exclude the Iraqi prime minister, lawmakers said Monday, a step likely to stoke fears of increasing Iranian influence and shake up the political landscape before January parliamentary elections.

The coalition will include the largest Shiite party, the Iranian-backed Supreme Iraqi Islamic Council, or SIIC, and anti-U.S. cleric Muqtada al-Sadr's bloc, as well as some small Sunni and secular parties.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's Dawa Party was left out after the sides disagreed over leadership and other organizational issues as well as the Shiite politician's desire to broaden the coalition to include more prominent Sunnis and Kurds, officials said.

A strong showing by the new alliance in January's election would ensure the domination of Iraqi politics by Shiite religious parties that are viewed with suspicion by the Sunni Muslim minority, which lost its grip on power when Saddam Hussein's Sunni-led regime collapsed in 2003.

Monday's announcement represented a major realignment in the Iraqi political scene, which has been dominated by the Supreme Council and al-Maliki's Dawa Party since Saddam's overthrow.

The split between the rival Shiite camps is a new setback for al-Maliki's election hopes after his effort to portray himself as a champion of security was battered by a series of devastating bombings in Baghdad and in northern Iraq in recent weeks. The most recent struck the foreign and finance ministries on Wednesday, killing about 100 people.

An aide to al-Maliki congratulated the new alliance but said Dawa was seeking a wider spectrum of political parties, tribal leaders and other officials.

"We have no strategic differences with them, but we argued with them about the mechanism of participation in the alliance and the need to open this alliance to include a broad range of political powers," Hassan al-Sineid said in televised remarks.

The announcements were a rare public show of Shiite disunity, but both sides were careful not to appear to be at odds and to stress the possibility that Dawa could still join the alliance.

"We are hoping for their participation and the door will be left open for them," said ex-Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, who joined the alliance at the head of a bloc he recently formed.

Iraqi Vice President Adel Abdul-Mahdi, a top SIIC member, also reached out to Dawa, saying it was important to present a strong united front that can address the overwhelming challenges facing the country.

Al-Maliki's aides have said the prime minister was working to form a broad-based, national coalition that he could lead in the January vote in a bid to end sectarian politics. The inclusion of Sunnis in the Shiite-led alliance announced Monday and his own battered image could force him to reconsider.

Talks were under way between al-Maliki and the main Sunni Awakening Council leader in Anbar province, Sheik Ahmed Abu Risha, on forming their own alliance along with others to compete in January's vote, a government official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to disclose the information.

The coalition will replace the United Iraqi Alliance, which won control of parliament in the last parliamentary elections in December 2005 but began to unravel later with the withdrawal of two major factions and the bitter rivalry between al-Maliki and the Supreme Council.

Members of the groups joining the list stood one-by-one at a news conference to announce the new list.

Al-Jaafari, al-Maliki's predecessor, read a statement, noting that the ailing leader of the Supreme Council, Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim, was absent because he has been hospitalized in Iran.

"We wished that al-Hakim could be with us, but he is sick," al-Jaafari said. "We pray he will feel better soon but he will be with us spiritually," al-Jaafari said.

Al-Hakim, who was diagnosed with lung cancer in 2007, has wielded enormous influence since the 2003 U.S. invasion, maintaining close ties to both the Americans and his Iranian backers.

He has groomed his son, Ammar, as his successor. Ammar al-Hakim also missed the news conference because he had rushed to Iran as his father's health deteriorated, officials said.

Al-Jaafari said the new alliance would be focused on rebuilding the economy and security in Iraq.

Also absent was al-Sadr, who is believed to be in Iran. His bloc was represented by lawmakers and officials.

The list included several Sunnis, comprising a small faction from the western Anbar province that includes fighters who joined forces with the Americans against al-Qaida in Iraq and won several seats in provincial elections earlier this year.

"Al-Qaida announced their Islamic state and we managed to topple them," said the leader of the Anbar faction, Sheik Hameed al-Hais. "We call on the new alliance to be serious in dealing with security in Iraq."

Ex-Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Chalabi, a one-time Pentagon favorite who leads the secular Iraqi National Congress, is also in the new alliance.

The Supreme Council lost control of major southern provinces to an alliance led by al-Maliki in the Jan. 31 provincial elections, raising concern among other Shiite politicians that internal divisions could cost them seats in January's parliamentary elections.

If the alliance does well, Tehran could gain deeper influence in Iraq just as U.S. forces begin to withdraw. The last American soldier is scheduled to leave Iraq by the end of 2011.

Many Sunnis consider the Supreme Council as little more than an instrument of Iranian policy. The party was founded in Iran in the early 1980s with the help of Tehran's ruling clergy and its militia fought alongside the Iranians against Iraq in the 1980-88 war.

___

Associated Press Writers Hamid Ahmed and Bushra Juhi contributed to this report.



To: i-node who wrote (507549)8/24/2009 11:47:32 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578494
 
While there are numerous misleading remarks in your post, this one stands out:

None of its false. You've never been to Europe. You've never used their system. How can you possibly expound on an issue where you only have half the info.

. Cost controls stifle innovation.

False. The United States is home to groundbreaking medical research, but so are other countries with much lower cost structures. Any American who's had a hip or knee replacement is standing on French innovation. Deep-brain stimulation to treat depression is a Canadian breakthrough. Many of the wonder drugs promoted endlessly on American television, including Viagra, come from British, Swiss or Japanese labs.


Aside from the foreign innovations/discoveries the guy reports in his article, I know for a fact that Germany was the leader on responses to AIDS and certain cancers. I know that because during the time I worked for an LA councilman we were looking for the most advancements in AIDS treatments. Twenty five percent of his district was gay and it was a big issue among them. I found that Germany had the lead......and during that time, I also found out that they were leading in the development of drugs to fight certain cancers. In fact, the biggest pharm. companies are in Europe, not the US. There is no question that the US is a leader in biotech research but that doesn't mean research has been stifled in Europe and other places.

While it is true you can find particular drugs, tests and devices that didn't originate in the US, half of medical innovation in the world comes from the US. Probably more.

I don't disagree and that won't stop because we reform our health care.

More importantly, essential discoveries like CT scannners, might be invented in other countries but literally cannot be developed and marketed there. The CT is a case in point. Discovered by the Brits, they tried to market it on their own, and failed miserably. Only after EMI licensed the technology to GE did it turn into a viable product that made peoples' lives better.

This is the way it works. The US has the economic and capital structure to ENCOURAGE innovation. These other countries have to innovate IN SPITE of where they're located.


The key to what you say up above is that we have the capital structure because of our greater size and wealth to fund more research than other countries. That too won't change under reform.