SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (321000)8/24/2009 4:16:50 PM
From: Nadine Carroll4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793917
 

I do not understand why the White House wants to directly supervise the interrogation of terrorists. Are they insane? If we are hit again with another 9/11, this will be a political disaster for them. Can we expect to see terrorist suspects kicking back with a beer in the Rose Garden?

I agree. You'd think they would want some political distance just in case. I can only assume that the reality of needing to throw a sop to their seething left-wing base far outweighs the possibility (quite remote to them apparently) of our getting hit again.



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (321000)8/24/2009 4:20:46 PM
From: MrLucky  Respond to of 793917
 
You must look at the positive side. Obama gets to appoint a Friendly Terrorist Interrogations Czar.



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (321000)8/25/2009 2:11:00 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793917
 
Give Obama another week or two, and he will have another inside the White House unit calling the individual bullet shots the Military makes while doing their duty.

Even worse yet, he will have yet another Czar at the head who has no responsibility to the Congress.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News