SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FJB who wrote (321306)8/26/2009 5:18:40 PM
From: FJB3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794009
 
New FCC Officer’s Proposed Regs Would Stifle Free Speech
August 17th, 2009 at 11:20 am by DUSTIN SIGGINS | 5 Comments |
Share
According to Jillian Bandes, localism (read: government-forced diversity) and progressive radio proponent Mark Lloyd has been named to the position of Chief Diversity Officer at the Federal Communications Commission. Bandes and Seton Motley of the Media Research Center, while uncertain of what Lloyd might do in the position, have no good news for those who support the free market in radio. In 2007 he wrote “We call for ownership rules that we think will create greater local diversity of programming, news, and commentary. And we call for more localism by putting teeth into the licensing rules” in addition to other anti-free speech rhetoric.

This is of great concern to many around this country- fortunately, freedom-loving private citizens are not alone. Mike Pence (R-IN) has been taking on localism and the Fairness Doctrine over the last few years- some, including myself, thought he was overreacting to the doctrine and not paying enough attention to the localism part, but either way Pence has been a tireless supporter of the right to free speech. He gave a very good speech about the Broadcaster Freedom Amendment he sponsored about a month ago (and in 2007), and in it he described the negative effect the Fairness Doctrine had on talk radio on all sides of the political spectrum. As a former radio man himself, Pence understands freedom of speech and how it should be allowed, even if you disagree with what is said.

Last fall, I conducted a partial case study on proposed FCC localism regulations and their probable effect on small, local markets (which they are supposed to help). In interviewing a number of media people in the Littleton, New Hampshire area, I found only one supporter of any kind of regulations -a well-established author and former newspaper reporter in Littleton - but no other local media owners in favor of the regulations. The cost of business, the owners felt, would be prohibitive and encourage further conglomeration strangleholds, which the regulations were also alleged to prevent (according to the regulation supporters). Again, freedom of speech is too important to be left to government intervention.

In recent years, Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez has shut down free radio stations- this month alone, he shut down 12 of the 34 stations told to go off the air. Chavez, of course, has said he is “democratizing” radio- a number of civil rights groups, however, disagree, including several in the United States. Ironically, our media hammers Chavez - but praises and supports government regulation in this country because it doesn’t like talk radio. I wonder what would happen if localism regulations and radio conglomeration rules were applied to newspapers, magazines, television news and Hollywood, where liberals dominate, and not just to conservative talk radio, where the much-ridiculed Rush Limbaugh is king.



To: FJB who wrote (321306)8/26/2009 9:41:40 PM
From: KLP5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794009
 
All the President's Men

Tuesday , August 25, 2009
By Glenn Beck

foxnews.com

This is probably the hardest week of broadcast in my life.
I have been trying to figure out what's going on with my country since President Bush argued — with a straight face — that he could protect America while keeping our borders wide open. You and I both knew at the time that was a lie. You were angry, but you also had a life (family, job) and probably didn't start watching things closely. Because of my job, I did.

Over the last few years, I have come to believe things that I don't want to believe. They are uncomfortable and have made me — much to the aid of Jon Stewart's wallet — weep for my country.

I told you on Monday that there are three principles this show will drum through:

• Question with boldness
• Hold to the truth
• Speak without fear

Let me focus on the second one for a bit.

If you truly ask what Jefferson called honest questions, with a sincere heart, the answers may take you to very uncomfortable places.

Nobody wants to think our president is a bad guy; President Obama actually seems like a likeable guy. And he may be the greatest guy ever. But is he in step with you and what you believe this country is?

When you hear the evidence, you have a decision to make: Will I bury my head in the sand, refusing to believe because it doesn't fit my agenda or my comfort level? Or will I hold to the truth whatever it is, so I may be a part of the solution and not an enabler to the problem.

On Monday night's show, I asked the tough questions on the president's special advisers — his "czars." They have the ear of the president of the United States; we should know more about them. What are they telling him? Does he listen to them? Who are they?

The first one we talked about was Van Jones — a self proclaimed radical, revolutionary communist; a man who co-founded an organization, whose own concluding documents said:

"Mobilizing young people of color into militant direct action — and combine it with more deeply-rooted organizing in our communities."

When we asked the White House if they knew about Jones' radical roots and if it gave them pause to make him a special adviser, the White House told us he was "focused on only one issue."

That is not an answer to the question. And beyond that, he's a communist… focused on job creation? What jobs does a communist create?

Let me continue to ask: Who has the president surrounded himself with?

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

THEN PRESIDENTIAL-CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA: Let me tell you who I associate with. On economic policy, I associate with Warren Buffett and former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker. If I'm interested in figuring out my foreign policy, I associate myself with my running mate, Joe Biden, or with Dick Lugar, the Republican ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, or General Jim Jones, the former supreme allied commander of NATO. Those are the people, Democrats and Republicans, who have shaped my ideas and who will be surrounding me in the White House.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

We already know of at least five radical leftists currently advising our president — and these are just the ones who are open about their radical beliefs and far-left ideas:

• Van Jones, green jobs "czar" — admits he's a communist

• John Holdren, science "czar" — proposed "compulsory sterilization" and forced abortions to control population

• Cass Sunstein, regulatory "czar" — proposed bans on hunting and eating meat and proposed that your dog to be allowed to have an attorney in court. And a fairness doctrine for the Internet, which he has since stepped away from

• Carol Browner, global warming "czar" — was part of Socialist International, a group for "global governance"

• Ezekiel Emmanuel, health care adviser — proponent of the Complete Lives System, which puts values on lives based mostly by age

How many Marxists, communists and anti-capitalists do you have around you on a daily basis?

But President Obama doesn't just have socialists and communists advising him. On Monday night I told you about the people who helped write the stimulus: the Apollo Alliance.

Jeff Jones, one of the leaders of the Apollo Alliance, may or may not have ever advised the president — we don't know because we can't get the entrance records at the White House.
But we do know this: Jones' organization, which he chairs in New York, had a lot to do with the stimulus bill — according to Harry Reid:

"This legislation is the first step in building a clean energy economy that creates jobs.... The Apollo Alliance has been an important factor in helping us develop and execute a strategy that makes great progress on these goals and in motivating the public to support them."

Does the president know he's had two pretty big encounters with the founders of the Weather Underground? A group that bombed government buildings?

We asked the White House — we are still waiting on a response.
By the way, we've also told you that the White House has tried or wanted to go around the FBI to have vetting done by the White House. I would think that based on what's happening here at the White House, it's pretty important to have an outside eye vet some of the people who may be advising our president.
How many times do we have to find a Marxist, communist, socialist, a revolutionary or, what seems amazing to me, a simple anti-capitalist near, around or advising the president of the United States before we ask the question, when he promises this:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

OBAMA: We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Is he promising to transform us into something unrecognizable to most Americans, but not unrecognizable to Hugo Chavez: "Hey, Obama has just nationalized nothing more and nothing less than General Motors. Comrade Obama! Fidel, careful or we are going to end up to his right!"
Is it un-American, hateful or outrageous to sincerely and honestly ask this question when the communist president of Venezuela says that?

— Watch "Glenn Beck" weekdays at 5 p.m. ET on FOX News Channel