SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (25060)8/27/2009 12:02:28 PM
From: Triffin  Respond to of 36921
 
edit



To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (25060)8/27/2009 1:09:24 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36921
 
'Crude': The Film Chevron Doesn't Want You to See
By Han Shan, AlterNet
Posted on August 26, 2009, Printed on August 27, 2009
alternet.org

American oil giant Chevron is now the 5th largest company on the planet. But I doubt Chevron executives have had much time to savor their 'Masters of the Universe' status lately. Instead, I imagine them working overtime with their internal public relations team and mercenary army of PR spinmasters, lobbyists, and sponsored bloggers they've brought on to fight what looks more and more like a losing battle. What's got them burning the midnight oil?

Two weeks from today, a powerful new documentary film is opening in New York, and then playing in select theaters across the country. Called CRUDE, the film tells a shocking story that Chevron does not want the world to know.

Three years in the making by acclaimed filmmaker Joe Berlinger (Brother's Keeper, Paradise Lost, and Metallica: Some Kind of Monster), CRUDE chronicles the epic legal battle to hold Chevron accountable for its systematic contamination of the Ecuadorian Amazon -- an environmental tragedy experts call the "Amazon Chernobyl," and believe is the worst case of oil-related contamination on Earth. While drilling in the Ecuadorian Amazon from 1964 to 1990, Texaco, now Chevron, deliberately dumped more than 18 billion gallons of toxic wastewater, spilled roughly 17 million gallons of crude oil, and left hazardous waste in hundreds of open pits dug out of the forest floor. The company operated using substandard practices that were obsolete in order to increase its profit margin by $3 per barrel of crude. Of course, the local people and ecosystems paid the price instead, but they're fighting back.

Centering on a landmark lawsuit filed by the indigenous people and campesinos who continue to suffer a severe public health crisis caused by Chevron's contamination, CRUDE is a high-stakes David vs. Goliath legal drama with 30,000 Amazon rainforest dwellers facing down the San Ramon, California-based oil behemoth.

Amazon Watch's Clean Up Ecuador Campaign - featured in the film - is leading grassroots efforts to promote the theatrical release, enlisting human rights and environmental allies across the U.S. in an outreach and word-of-mouth marketing campaign. Numerous organizations have pledged support and committed to concrete efforts to build the profile of this must-see film, including Rainforest Action Network, Oxfam USA, WITNESS, EarthRights International, Human Rights Watch, and Global Green, to name just a few.

CRUDE is not a simplistic piece of agit-prop. Filmmaker Joe Berlinger shows all sides of this monumental case and the stories and people behind it. Chevron is given plenty of opportunity to share its perspective. Unfortunately for them, in the end, truth does appear to pick a side and it's not Chevron's.

Ultimately, the film gives us a glimpse of the beauty and mystery of the Amazon and its indigenous cultures, and puts a human face on the devastation left there by three decades of oil operations. But it does a lot more. Among other things, it also tells the story of what it takes to go up against one of the most powerful companies on the planet.

Especially inspiring is the story of Pablo Fajardo, the young former oil field worker who completed his law degree by correspondence course and is now the lead attorney for the plaintiffs. Pablo argues passionately and courageously for the impacted communities, and you won't be able to help cheering him on.

Advising Pablo is another lawyer named Steven Donziger, who helped file the original lawsuit in New York back in 1993. Coming across as somehow simultaneously cynical and idealistic, Donziger is brash and and big and loud and manipulative. And if you're rooting for the plaintiffs, you'll find yourself thinking "I'm glad he's on our side."

And there are a slew of other fascinating real-life characters, from a Cofán indigenous leader who travels from the jungle by foot, canoe, bus, train, and plane to speak about the plight of his people at a Chevron shareholder meeting in Houston, to a Chevron attorney who comes across like the Tilda Swinton character from Michael Clayton (how does she sleep at night?). We meet Trudie Styler - wife of Sting and founder with him of the Rainforest Foundation - who visits the affected communities and quickly becomes passionately, earnestly involved.

It's easy to get behind CRUDE because it not only tells an important story. It tells it in an inspiring, powerful, engaging, and dare I say it, entertaining way. Joe Berlinger had a hit with his last film about Metallica going through group therapy. He brings the same storytelling acumen to this story that already had dramatic elements galore.

The theatrical release of CRUDE comes at a moment of unprecedented importance in the campaign to hold Chevron accountable and achieve justice for the people of the Ecuadorian Amazon. What's more, a victory for this grassroots campaign will send shockwaves through the oil industry and corporate boardrooms around the world, forever changing the way companies do business.

With CRUDE coming out in theaters, we have an unprecedented opportunity to massively increase public awareness of this issue and massively increase public pressure for Chevron to be held accountable. But it begins with getting people out to the movies!

The film opens in New York on 09/09/09, followed by runs in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and thirty more smaller cities across the country [full list]. This sounds great but think of it compared to G.I. Joe, which was playing in 4,000 theaters at the same time a couple weeks ago! Theaters nationwide will be watching to see how the film performs in the first few weeks to decide whether to screen it themselves so please, help us spread the word.

Blog about CRUDE, post the trailer and poster and web banners on your social networks, follow and retweet @crudethemovie & @amazonwatch, become a fan of the film on Facebook, and join our mailing list for news, updates, and action alerts.

Visit www.ChevronToxico.com/crude for resources to help you promote CRUDE and get involved with the Clean Up Ecuador Campaign. Join us now so you can join us for the campaign's victory party in the near future!

You can also visit the official film website at: www.crudethemovie.com. to read more about the making of the film, to sign up for updates from the filmmaker, and to see the latest play-dates.

Han Shan is a human rights and environmental justice campaigner living in New York City. He is currently serving as a coordinator of the Clean Up Ecuador campaign for Amazon Watch.
© 2009 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: alternet.org



To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (25060)8/27/2009 3:16:56 PM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36921
 
Computer generated climate models are like computer generated Hollywood movies = fun to watch but they have only a loose relationship with reality.

We don't go to a movie and think "Omigosh, alien monsters from another planet are going to land in Woking and take over Earth". They are just movies.

Weta Workshops uses computer models to generate all sorts of imaginary output which makes excellent stories.

Anything at all can be specified as the output.

It's the same with computer generated climate outputs. The output depends on what the model's workings are designed to do.

The big mistake people are making about Earth's climate is the anthropomorphic idea that it was in some kind of balance which was optimum for life in general. Their conclusion is that anything humans do is ipso facto a bad thing.

A casual glance at climate records shows that the climate varies enormously and even in short times measured in decades and maybe even years.

There are also long term trends which are not cyclic but are one way trends such as the appearance of free oxygen, the stripping of carbon from the ecosphere and burying of it as coal, shale, oil, gas, bitumens, limestone, peat and the elimination of CO2.

Life is a mechanism for removing carbon from the ecosphere. Gaia is a suicidal maniac.

Without life, CO2 sat happily in the atmosphere. But then the carboniferous jungles stripped the carbon out and produced oxygen. That was convenient for us because after hundreds of millions of years of battle with umpty mega peta-trillion beings dying for the cause, DNA got around to producing me and you.

That was a desirable process because here I am and it's quite pleasant to be here compared with not being here, which is how things were until 60 years ago when nothing at all was happening. But unfortunately, once the living things have had their day, they die and their carcasses, trunks, roots fall to the ground or sink to the ocean floor and become sedimentary.

Limestone is the husks of squillions of quadrillions of little and large shelly and bony fauna. Coal is the repository of eons of Amazonian forests long gone never to return. Oil is the subducted, cooked and stored in traps organic leftovers from oceanic crust sediments. Gas is the same but processed differently. Shale is geosynclinal sediment set in stone along with marine life of the area.

All people are doing is bringing a little bit of the coal, oil and gas back to life. It's a new lease on life, but all too short. We can do it for a few hundred years using tars and coal as well as the oil and gas, but plants are busily stripping the CO2 nearly as fast as we can produce it.

Something like half the CO2 produced has already been stripped from the atmosphere. So it's not as though we are going to be able to fill it up. Nobody is being paid to produce CO2 so they are always looking for ways to do things at less cost. People find it cheaper to buy insulation than more electricity. They invent little cars which get 100 kilometres per litre. They invent cyberspace so they don't have to travel at all - not even to post a letter [this message traveling at the speed of light without even a stamp or envelope, no jet fuel needed].

With Peak People in 2037 and increasing efficiency, peak CO2 output and Peak Oil should be at about the same time.

It would be interesting to see what Hansen's model has for human population, their car types, transport designs, living styles, cyberspace usage.

Rumour has it that climate models are so amateurish that they don't even include cloud cover, dew points etc.

Deserts grow and shrink as does ice cover and chlorophyll cover, all of which needs to be in the model.

Life isn't a movie and climate isn't a model, though Al Gore combined the two in An Inconvenient Truth. Oddly, people left the movie thinking a movie about a model made by a politician was something real and truthful. That's simply hilarious. How do you know when a politician is lying? When his mouth is moving in the movies.

Mqurice