SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : BuSab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1171)8/27/2009 5:41:14 PM
From: SmoothSail  Respond to of 23934
 
I don't have a problem with it either. Matter of fact, I think they should check IDs to make sure the people belong to a particular district.

If my congressman - Jane Harman held a meeting, which so far she's refused to, I'd want only people from the district in the meeting and all outsiders who cause a ruckus arrested.

I think checking IDs by the poll workers during an election is also a good idea. I have to give my signature next to my name when I go into vote. I think the signatures should be compared. Why would anyone object to that?



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1171)8/31/2009 8:12:23 AM
From: Oral Roberts1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23934
 

I don't have a problem with this. I believe that the congresscritters should be talking to and listening to their constituents.

Only problem I have with it is they vote to allow people to vote without showing an ID. So they can vote without one but they can't ask a question. Rather bizarre IMO.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News