SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (508570)8/28/2009 10:02:05 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576600
 
Stocks open higher after Intel boosts forecast

16 minutes ago

By STEPHEN BERNARD
AP Business Writer

(AP:NEW YORK) Stocks are opening higher after Intel raised its revenue guidance for the third quarter.

The world's largest maker of computer chips says it now expects sales of $8.8 billion to $9.2 billion in the current quarter. It had previously forecast revenue in the range of $8.1 billion to $8.9 billion.

Intel's upbeat report comes a day after computer maker Dell reported better-than-expected results for its May-July quarter.

Investors have been looking for signs of improving consumer spending to determine the potential timing and size of any economic recovery.

In early trading, the Dow Jones industrial average is up 21 at 9,602. The Standard & Poor's 500 index is up 6 at 1,036, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq composite index is up 23 at 2,051.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

NEW YORK (AP) _ Stock futures extended their gains Friday, pointing to a higher open as Intel Corp. raised its revenue guidance for the third quarter.

Futures had been modestly higher throughout the morning before the chipmaker provided the latest sign businesses are starting to recover from the ongoing recession.

Overseas markets rose on strong earnings from consumer goods companies and an increase in European economic confidence.

The world's largest maker of computer microprocessors said it now expects sales of $8.8 billion to $9.2 billion in the current quarter. It had previously forecast revenue in the range of $8.1 billion to $8.9 billion.

Intel's upbeat report comes a day after computer maker Dell Inc. reported better-than-expected results for its May-July quarter. While sales continued to fall because of reduced spending by consumers and businesses, Dell said it has seen signs of improvements.

Investors have been looking for signs of improving consumer spending, which accounts for more than two-third of economic activity, to determine the potential timing and size of any economic recovery.

Ahead of the opening bell, Dow Jones industrial average futures rose 65, or 0.7 percent, to 9,632. Standard & Poor's 500 index futures rose 8.80, or 0.9 percent, to 1,038.10, while tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 index futures jumped 22.50, or 1.4 percent, to 1,661.50.

Investors brushed off a Commerce Department report earlier Friday that said consumer spending rose 0.2 percent in July, which was in line with economists' expectations.

Growth in spending and consumer confidence has been slowed by rising unemployment and weak income growth. Spending got a boost during the month from an increase in auto sales tied to the popular Cash for Clunkers program.

The latest report said personal income was flat in July. Economists polled by Thomson Reuters expected a 0.2 percent increase. Personal income, which fuels future spending increases, has been hammered during the recession as employers cut payrolls and forced workers to take unpaid days off to hold down wage costs.

"The numbers today seem to be more or less in line with expectations, so we wouldn't expect to see any rally or sell off on the data," said Eric Thorne, a senior vice president and investment adviser at Bryn Mawr Trust Wealth Management.

Investors also get a reading on the psyche of the consumer as the University of Michigan releases the final results of its August sentiment survey. When the preliminary August results released two weeks ago were worse than expected, it helped spur a big sell-off in the market.

The report is due out at 9:55 a.m. EDT.

Major indexes edged out gains on Thursday after starting the day lower. The Dow rose for the eighth consecutive day, increasing 37 points, its longest winning streak since April 2007. The market's five-month rally appears to have lost much of its steam as analysts say most of the improving economic data has already been priced into stocks. But, traders also aren't ready to completely reverse course and start selling off stocks believing the market is overbought.

Meanwhile, bond prices mostly fell. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note, which moves opposite its price, rose to 3.52 percent from 3.46 percent late Thursday. The yield on the three-month T-bill, considered one of the safest investments, was flat at 0.14 percent.

The dollar mostly fell against other major currencies, while gold prices rose.

Overseas, Japan's Nikkei stock average rose 0.6 percent. In afternoon trading, Britain's FTSE 100 rose 1 percent, Germany's DAX index gained 1.1 percent, and France's CAC-40 climbed 1.3 percent.

Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



To: Road Walker who wrote (508570)8/28/2009 10:14:27 AM
From: tejek1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1576600
 
My other thought was that bin Laden won the war on terror. The US is crumbling from the inside. We are at each others throats. We can't solve basic problems.

In a way, he did win. Its sad.

No, it's really different now. Much more hate than I ever remember. Dating it to 9/11 might be controversial but it seems to be the time when things really started to unravel.

I think it was always there.......it had been building since the 1980s. I think 9/11 simply brought it to the surface.



To: Road Walker who wrote (508570)8/28/2009 10:46:59 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1576600
 
the left started the hating when Reagan was elected. you wackos lost it then.



To: Road Walker who wrote (508570)8/28/2009 10:52:10 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1576600
 
""On January 21, 2009, his first day in office, Barack Obama implemented and signed into law Executive Order 13489, denying any release of anything about him."

A writer on the following site felt that Mr. Moran should also ask Obama for his ID and credentials before responding or entertaining any comments by Mr. Obama------just as Mr. Moran is asking of Town Hall participants.

Certainly seems fair to this writer-----read more----mj

**********************************************

Congressman challenges town hall attendee as not from his distict makes him produce I.D.

breitbart.tv

***********************************************************

"Obama continues to refuse to provide the media with school records, passports, college theses, law school records, law firm clients, medical records, Illinois State Senate files, and other documents about his record:
Original vault copy (long form) birth certificate – not released

Certificate of live birth (short form) – alleged forgery released
web.israelinsider.com
wnd.com
westernjournalism.com

wnd.com
This is Obama’s Kenyan Birth Certificate dated Aug. 4, 1961

Dunham-Obama marriage license – not released
Dunham-Soetoro marriage license – not released
Soetoro adoption records – not released
Besuki School application – obtained
web.israelinsider.com
Punahou School records – not released

Selective Service Registration – alleged forgery released
debbieschlussel.com

Occidental College records – not released
Passport (Indonesian) – not released
Passport (U.S.) – not released
Columbia University records – not released
Columbia University thesis – not released
Harvard Law School records – not released
Harvard Law Review articles – none released
Baptism certificate – none released
Medical records – not released (except for a one-page statement saying Obama is healthy)
Illinois State Senate records – not released
Illinois State Senate schedule – not released (alleged to have been lost)
Law practice client list and billing records – not released
University of Chicago scholarly articles – none released (and none perhaps ever written)
Campaign donor analysis – not released
List of all campaign workers who are lobbyists – not released
List of trips outside the United States before 2008 – not released

On January 21, 2009, his first day in office, Barack Obama implemented and signed into law Executive Order 13489, denying any release of anything about him.



To: Road Walker who wrote (508570)8/28/2009 10:57:04 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1576600
 
Obama and the Thugs
By Kyle-Anne Shiver

August 28, 2009
americanthinker.com

"If you want the next four years lookin' like the last eight, then I'm not your candidate. But if you want real change...then I need you. I need you to go out and talk to your friends, talk to your neighbors...I want you to argue with them, get in their faces...you guys are the ones who can make the change."
- Candidate Barack Obama to supporters September, 2008

Early last fall, an old friend of mine and long-time volunteer for Republican women's associations, called me from her home in Orlando, Florida. She was quite shaken. She had just returned from what was intended to be a small, quiet McCain support outing, just like the ones she had been dutifully attending for 30 years. The small group of middle-aged homemakers took their little signs to an approved street corner, carried their small American flags and assembled to do their hour's vote-for-our-guy walk before heading off to the nearest coffee shop to divvy up coming-week duties of stuffing envelopes and making phone calls.

But something had changed between the last election and 2008. My friend told of a morning from hell, in which the women were rudely accosted on the street by young male thugs (her word), who called them "c*nts," "whitey whores" and "stupid bitches." These young males got in their faces and jostled them with angry shoves. My friend said that in all the years she had been doing just this simple patriotic activity, she had never had such a frightening experience. It was to be the first of several, which have left her shaken to this day.

Later on into the fall campaign, I spoke with Dr. Lynette Long, a former Hillary supporter compiling data on what she deemed, "Caucus Fraud." She referred me to a set of video testimonials, in which middle-aged women mostly, gave grizzly accounts of the same thuggery employed against them in caucus settings.

The data compiled by Dr. Long, along with the video-recorded testimonials of dozens of caucus-goers, are indeed convincing. According to Dr. Long, in a personal interview, reports from caucus attendees are pretty horrifying at worst, wholly undemocratic at best. Female Clinton supporters reported being called "c*nts" and other sexual epithets, being spat upon by Obama supporters, being threatened physically, and an overall environment of hostility. Not exactly the democratic process to which we are accustomed.

In the end, it was the caucus states, where such strong-arm tactics were employed by Obama supporters, which finally gave Obama the victory. As Dr. Long points out, the only caucus in the entire nominating contest that Obama lost was Nevada. In every other caucus, relying heavily on thug intimidation, Obama prevailed.

So, it should come as no surprise to anyone that the same thug tactics are now being used against MediCoup** resisters at townhalls around the Country.

The most shocking thug event, so far, took place early this month in St. Louis. In his own words, Kenneth Gladney, victim of assault, tells what happened:

Well, first, I was there to sell, you know, flags and buttons and stuff that said, "Don't tread on me." And I was setting out there, and I guess something got -- just went through my head. I said I'm just going to give them away and stuff like that. So a pastor's wife walked up to me, and she just took a liking to some of the buttons. So I start showing her some of the buttons and everything. This guy walked up and he said, "Who in the -- who in the blank is selling or giving away this stuff here?" I said, "Sir, this is my merchandise. And would you like a flag or a button or something like that?" And he said, "What kind of 'n' are you to be giving this stuff out."

Yes, they surrounded me. Actually, after the first two guys got me on the ground, they surrounded me and started kicking me in the head and in the back, and the knees and stuff like that. And after it was done, I got up, kind of dazed, looking for my glasses. And the one guy actually was coming at me again, and that's when the police came in and, you know, cordoned off everything and started, you know, started arresting people.

This is change, all right, but I'll be darned if I see a whole lot of hope.

Then, on August 13, outside a townhall in Thousand Oaks, California, three doctors were assaulted when they attempted to speak their minds. The doctors, all wearing scrubs, were locked out of the townhall meeting and began voicing their objections to an orderly crowd, when suddenly they were lunged at by an angry white male. Fortunately for the docs, the man was prevented causing real harm when other men forced him to the ground, whereupon he was promptly arrested.

A videographer at a Tampa, Florida townhall got roughed up by union thugs and had his camera smashed. A local doctor from Douglasville, Georgia was shouted down by his own congressman and accused of not being a constituent, a charge that was later shown to be blatantly false.

A very fishy swastika was painted on the Congressman's office sign the next day.

If any side has been guilty of astroturfing at townhalls, it is Obama supporters. People posing as doctors have turned up at various events, hailing the President's plan, only to be found out later. Vandals smashed windows at the Democratic Party office in Denver early this week. More astroturfing, apparently. As Gateway Pundit has detailed:

The young vandal who smashed windows at the DNC headquarters in Denver on Tuesday worked for a democratic politician, was paid by a SEIU-related front group, and was arrested at the RNC convention last year in St. Paul.

Honestly, I never thought I would live to see the day when a president one-upped Nixon. But this Obama thuggery gets worse by the day and our once-valiant mainstream press just yawns and accuses the innocent.

Even Richard Nixon never, as far as we know, went so far as to orchestrate manufactured news, advise his supporters to "get in their faces" or use taxpayer dollars to promote political causes.

What in the world is this Country coming to?

Our Founders are surely staring aghast from their heavenly abodes. And I'll bet my own proverbial farm that I know which side they're pulling for.



To: Road Walker who wrote (508570)8/28/2009 10:59:21 AM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576600
 
"One of his favorite topics of humor was Chappaquiddick" [Mark Hemingway]

Jules Crittenden mentioned on his blog he heard Ed Klein, former foreign editor of Newsweek and editor-in-chief of The New York Times Magazine, recalling on air that Ted Kennedy liked to joke about Chappaquiddick. It seemed to defy belief, so I listened to the episode of The Diane Rehm Show in question and sure enough — I've transcribed what Klein told guest host Katy Kay (Here's a link to the audio in WMA format, relevant portion starts at about 30:15):

>>>I don't know if you know this or not, but one of his favorite topics of humor was indeed Chappaquiddick itself. And he would ask people, "have you heard any new jokes about Chappaquiddick?" That is just the most amazing thing. It's not that he didn't feel remorse about the death of Mary Jo Kopechne, but that he still always saw the other side of everything and the ridiculous side of things, too.<<<

EXCUSE ME? If that's true it makes Kennedy kind of a monster. The odd thing is that if you listen to the whole show, the tone of everyone involved is nauseatingly haigographic and reverential. Klein apparently let his guard down a bit; after he lets it slip Kennedy liked to joke about the woman he killed you can actually hear in his voice that he's trying to backpedal. The show actually cuts to a break as he's trying to explain himself, and I seriously wonder if it wasn't the producers trying to do Klein a favor. But I'm sorry, there appears to be little to that could explain this. It goes way beyond "you had to be there."
The Corner on National Review Online (27 August 2009)
corner.nationalreview.com



To: Road Walker who wrote (508570)8/28/2009 11:00:46 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1576600
 
Bill would give president emergency control of Internet

by Declan McCullagh
August 28, 2009 12:34 AM PDT

Internet companies and civil liberties groups were alarmed this spring when a U.S. Senate bill proposed handing the White House the power to disconnect private-sector computers from the Internet.
They're not much happier about a revised version that aides to Sen. Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybersecurity emergency.

The new version would allow the president to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" relating to "non-governmental" computer networks and do what's necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for "cybersecurity professionals," and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.

"I think the redraft, while improved, remains troubling due to its vagueness," said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which counts representatives of Verizon, Verisign, Nortel, and Carnegie Mellon University on its board. "It is unclear what authority Sen. Rockefeller thinks is necessary over the private sector. Unless this is clarified, we cannot properly analyze, let alone support the bill."...

news.cnet.com



To: Road Walker who wrote (508570)8/28/2009 12:53:44 PM
From: combjelly2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576600
 
"Dating it to 9/11 might be controversial but it seems to be the time when things really started to unravel."

It was an inflection point. Like with Katrina, the forces at play were there before, but it was a point of crystallization. Like with Katrina, it could have been used to build a better country, but it was deliberately manipulated to carry out a purely partisan agenda. And, quite frankly, like with Katrina, the repercussions will be reverberating through our history for a while.