SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (18066)8/28/2009 2:53:28 PM
From: Broken_Clock1 Recommendation  Respond to of 103300
 
True. But opening challenging Greenspan to initiate a housing bubble then denying it after the bursting bubble sends the world off the cliff is a bit much.

Ya think?(I see the NYT link is operating again. -g-

From: Yulya 7/11/2009 4:29:08 PM
1 Recommendation of 101417

By PAUL KRUGMAN Published: Friday, August 2, 2002

The basic point is that the recession of 2001 wasn't a typical postwar slump, brought on when an inflation-fighting Fed raises interest rates and easily ended by a snapback in HOUSING and consumer spending when the Fed brings rates back down again. This was a prewar-style recession, a morning after brought on by irrational exuberance. To fight this recession the Fed needs more than a snapback; it needs soaring household spending to offset moribund business investment. And to do that, as Paul McCulley of Pimco put it, Alan Greenspan needs to create a HOUSING BUBBLE to replace the Nasdaq bubble

Message 25775810

nytimes.com



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (18066)8/28/2009 6:08:12 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Show me an economist who is '100% accurate' in all of his pronouncements and policy prescriptions and I'll show you a FICTIONAL character.

Show me a home where the buffalo roam and I'll show you a house full of shit...

GZ