SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (509496)9/1/2009 12:15:00 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1582531
 
"We should set a goal to have manufacturing jobs be no less than 20% of total employment, about twice what it is today,"

Thirty/forty years ago, manu. jobs were over a third of total employment.



To: Road Walker who wrote (509496)9/1/2009 12:16:59 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1582531
 
Aborting girls

Several pro-life and Christian blogs picked up on an interview last week in which Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton condemned sex-selection abortion and acknowledged that it's a major problem in such countries as China and India.

"Obviously, there's work to be done in both India and China, because the infanticide rate of girl babies is still overwhelmingly high," Mrs. Clinton told the New York Times. "Unfortunately, with technology, parents are able to use sonograms to determine the sex of a baby, and to abort girl children simply because they'd rather have a boy. And those are deeply set attitudes."

Catholic blogger Jeff Miller was waiting for the other shoe to drop, but it didn't.

"As you would expect the NYT does not have a follow up question in regards to sex-selection abortion. No question as to how if abortion is a 'right' then how does doing it because of the sex of the child then make it a problem. Either it is a human person or it is not. The sex of a 'tissue mass' would not matter. Does the women have a so-called choice just as long as the reason is not sex-selection?" Mr. Miller wrote at his site, the Curt Jester.

Pro-life blogger Jill Stanek underlined Mrs. Clinton's phrase "abort girl children simply because they'd rather have a boy" and wondered aloud at the reaction among pro-choice and feminist sites at that phrasing.

"This is problematic for hardcore pro-aborts, because Hillary is admitting preborns are distinct and separate human beings and also that some abortions are wrong. Can't find any pro-abort blog taking note of this traitorism," Mrs. Stanek said at her self-titled blog.

One feminist to make note was Laurie Carlsson at her site Speaking of Women's Rights, where she criticized "traitor" language, which Mrs. Stanek also used in an interview with Lifesite News. Ms. Carlsson's own comments were somewhat noncommittal, calling the issue "neither simple, nor clean-cut along lines of political beliefs or moral values."

"How does this fit into the feminist perspective of a woman having autonomy when it comes to her own body? Hillary Clinton recently spoke out against sex selection and her comments have been labeled by anti-abortion groups as 'traitorism in the ranks of the abortion advocates.' Is it not possible to have a nuanced view on such a highly contentious issue as abortion? The most important thing, it seems, is to allow the debate to have its own framework. To recognize that the world of assisted reproductive technology is ever-changing and that the way in which we approach a dialogue on these issues must change along with it," she wrote.



To: Road Walker who wrote (509496)9/1/2009 12:29:10 PM
From: tejek1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1582531
 
But don't expect a sudden return of low-skill jobs to the U.S. "This has been going on for a century with no sign that it is going to let up," says Ken Goldstein, an economist at the Conference Board, a business research group. "Low-value activities move elsewhere, and you replace those jobs with higher value-added activities. Jobs in biotech, high tech, and the energy field." But even counting in those higher-skilled jobs, Goldstein called Immelt's 20% goal "unrealistic," saying "that would be almost 30 million jobs -- we didn't even have that many manufacturing jobs in 1960."

That's BS......the country was much, much smaller in 1960.

Immelt's speech was not a nostalgic call for a reincarnation of America's 20th century manufacturing landscape. But he did admit that, in some areas, GE had outsourced too much and that it planned to "insource" some higher-value activities such as aviation component production and manufacturing-related software development. To that end, he announced plans to build a Manufacturing Technology & Software Center to develop next-generation manufacturing technologies for GE's leading renewable energy, aircraft engine, gas turbine, and other high-technology products. The $100 million, 100,000-square-foot facility in Wayne County, 25 miles east of Detroit, would create 1,100 jobs.

Of course, Immelt has that visonary thing.....he's a Dem! <g>

I am glad to read that GE is rethinking its practice of exporting manu. jobs. All major American corps should be doing the same thing.......moving jobs overseas is hurting the country. As I have said before, the Midwest so lags the rest of the nation in terms of labor and land costs that with a little creative thinking, I bet they could come close to matching the lower overhead costs that companies gain by moving overseas esp. when you throw in the travel costs for shipping products to stores from overseas plants and travel costs attributable to employee travel back and forth.

This needs to be a national goal defined by the Obama administration so that there can be the proper coordination with state and local gov'ts.

Good article! Thanks!



To: Road Walker who wrote (509496)9/1/2009 12:58:39 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1582531
 
Market Realities (Final)

By Scott Rutt
TheStreet.com Staff Reporter
8/31/2009 6:20 PM EDT


NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- "You can never afford to stop learning," Jim Cramer told the viewers of his "Mad Money" TV show Monday.

He said that even Wall Street veterans don't know everything, and unless investors keep learning, the markets will run circles around them. That's why he unveiled new rules for investing in turbulent markets.

Rule No 1: A bear market rally is still a rally. Cramer said this rule should be obvious, but conventional market wisdom still seems to think that a bear market rally is not worth profiting from.

Is it really so dangerous, he asked, to buy into a rally that's part of bear market? Cramer said the real danger lies in keeping your money on the sidelines, and missing out on the few opportunities bear markets give investors to make money.

Cramer dismissed the notion that stocks are "out of season" in a bear market. He reminded viewers that their goal as investors is to make money, no matter what the markets may be doing. Banks do not turn away money that's made in bear markets, he said. Since the market lows in March, the Dow has rallied some 36%, he said. "Aren't those points worth harvesting?"

Cramer conceded that it is sometimes harder to make money in a bear market, but noted that he's never seen a rally that caused people to lose money. "Don't be scared away," he said.

The China Card

Rule No. 2: America no longer rules the roost. For the better part of a century, America was the pre-eminent global economic superpower, said Cramer. "But all that's changed," he continued.

He said that the United States has now been replaced by communist China. "China is now more important," said Cramer, "it's simply a fact of life now and we have to get used to it."


Cramer said until investors come to terms with this fact, the markets will make them crazy. "Just look at the facts," he said. "While the U.S. issues trillions of dollars in debt every year, who is the only country big enough to buy them? China," he said. "While U.S. banks teetered on the precipice, Chinese banks weren't even flinching."

It was Chinese demand for resources, said Cramer, that powered much of the bull market that peaked in 2007. And it's the Chinese recovery that's helping to stabilize things now, he continued. Whether it's materials or oil, machinery or technology, all roads lead to China, he said.

"It's time to fact the facts, The People's Republic Of China is the most important Capitalist country," said Cramer.


Herd Strategy

Rule No. 3: Following The Herd Can Make You Money. There is no tried and true way to make money piggybacking off of the most successful investors out there, said Cramer, but there are easy gains to be made by following the herd if you do it right.

Cramer said some patterns are easy to spot. As the market rises, investors pour money into mutual funds, and those funds, in turn, keep on buying, sending stocks even higher. And as one fund starts beating the markets, you can bet investors will notice and continue pouring new money into it, said Cramer. Since no large fund can buy a meaningful amount of stock without moving the price, anticipating these large fund moves is a solid strategy, he said.

How does the strategy work? Find a successful fund, one that's been buying recently and see what they're buying and what they're core holding are. If you also like the fundamentals of the company, buy some. Fund managers like to buy more of the stocks they already own, said Cramer, especially if those stocks are working.

Cramer said this method of investor is battle tested and always comes up with aces. He said as long as investors are monitoring their funds quarterly, they will profit. Watch for turning tides however, said Cramer, if the fund begins losing money, their new investments will dry up and so will your profits.

Key Indicators

Rule No. 4: Be ready for change. If the market collapse of 2008 and 2009 and its meteoric rise since March of 2009 has taught us anything, said Cramer, it's that the indicators that matter can change in an instant.

Investors use indicators such as interest rates, unemployment rates, oil prices, and volatility indices to gauge where the markets are headed, he said. The key however, is to know which indicators matter.

Cramer said that gold historically has been a great indicator for investor fear. In times of instability, gold trends higher, or at least it used to. Today, he said, gold prices are more determined more by developing nations buying gold for jewelry than they are by U.S. economic worries. As a result, gold is no long a good indicator and will likely confuse investors who rely on it, he explained.

What's an indicator that works? Cramer said the Baltic Dry Index, a measure of imports into China. Others indicators, such as volatility and advance/decline lines, fluctuate in their relative importance, said Cramer.

Cramer said the bottom line is not to follow indicators blindly, but rather to thoroughly understand what they measure, and how important they are to the markets. "This is the best way to protect yourself from harmful sidetracks," he said.

Listening
Rule No. 5: Listen to everyone, not just the experts. "Listen to everyone, especially people who know more about consumer behavior that's different from yours," was Cramer's final word of wisdom.

Cramer said sometimes the people who are supposed to know, don't. On his show, he said there have been several CEOs and executives who have touted "things are great," right before the business cycle ended and the bottom fell out. He said others were shocked that "better-than-expected" results didn't move their stocks.

Other times, however, those who shouldn't know, do. Cramer cited analysts who discounted a restaurant's potential, despite the fact they had never eaten there, or a retailer's earnings potential because they'd never shopped there. In both these cases, hesaid others, maybe even you, would have better insights than Wall Street.

Such was the case with restauranteur Danny Meyer, whose notion that companies that provide great service and hospitality will be rewarded by the markets. Cramer said he originally dismissed Meyer's notion, but it turns out, he was right.

Cramer said investors need to listen to everyone and take advantage of every insight they can find.

-- Written by Scott Rutt in Washington

thestreet.com