SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E. Charters who wrote (23776)10/30/1997 7:45:00 AM
From: Bill Jackson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Eric; is there a need for Strathcona here?, or some such operating without the BD straightjacket?
I get suspicious when there are endless delays with no valid explanations. Deadlines are set, passed, and then an excuse emerges.
I am more charitable than you for this type of thing, as you shoot from the hip.
Bernie might have a suspicion and has filed the suit in hopes of??
If IPM has the gold/plat Bernie will blow away in the breeze.

Bill



To: E. Charters who wrote (23776)10/30/1997 8:18:00 AM
From: Dave Bissett  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
EC asks <<Would you say somebody had salted 121 samples if there was not a shred of evidence?>> In light of your accusations that IPM has made representations to the market without substantial evidence this is an utterly ridiculous question and an indication of the completely twisted logic you have resorted to.

Dave



To: E. Charters who wrote (23776)10/30/1997 8:29:00 AM
From: Theo  Respond to of 35569
 
Welcome Eric Charters to our thread on a little known, possible goldmine. You seem to be the inquizative type. Here we have Doctors, Lawyers, Geologists, Newsletter Writers, Goldminers, and tons of Investors. At last count we hold over a million shares of this speculative issue. We have inquired in Australia about each officers background. Checked their educational claims. Their past career positions. The lawsuits. Who shorts them. We are the experts!
You may ask anything. Have a beer, relax. We are all religious enough and don't need saviors.
<<<perhaps Mr. Lumbert is aware of events>>>>
Read post #13700 for a clue. You decide. Notice the date. I personally think the man may have a problem. He has sent me e-mail too. Most of us have gotten it.
<<<Would you say somebody had salted 121 samples if there was not
a shred of evidence?>>>>>
There are 28 more holes to bedrock that are more important. They have been drilled. It shows everything to the onlooker. All reasonable parimeters for a mine. Chain of custody by known engineering firm or firms. Ongoing feasiblity study by known engieering firm. Three firms being used to date. IPM hired them. Nobody leaving the country. Many companies with similar problems in extraction. Some of them private companies.
You have finally dicovered the best place to start doing a little due diligence on IPM. Good luck in your quest.
Theo