Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (510045)	9/2/2009 11:59:58 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578015

"And there is the reason threads like Politics for Pros exist" So extreme right wingnuts can have an echo chamber devoid of counter-argument?

To: i-node who wrote (510045)	9/3/2009 11:22:52 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1578015

I used to do it. But with you, Tenchu, harris et al not bothering, why should I? I left jlallen and _less out. They don't even try to make an argument. And there is the reason threads like Politics for Pros exist. The simple truth is that libs are not on an intellectual level that permits them to argue these topics with conservatives. So threads always turn into this. Too bad, but it is reality. ROTFLMAO! You're always good for a good laugh. Thanks.

To: i-node who wrote (510045)	9/3/2009 12:41:58 PM
From: combjelly	5 Recommendations Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1578015

"And there is the reason threads like Politics for Pros exist." You mean as an echo chamber that bans dissenting voices? Yeah, a lot of "intellectual heft" there... "The simple truth is that libs are not on an intellectual level that permits them to argue these topics with conservatives." Nonsense. None of the conservatives here, you included, show much in the way of intellectual involvement. Y'all have your ideology, and everything flows from it. Y'all are willing to rewrite history, distort events and even make stuff up wholesale to defend your belief system. On occasion, I have fun in detailing how your arguments are classical examples of fallacious arguments and intellectually dishonest. Which often result in attempts to do the same to me and others, almost always incorrectly. When presented with facts, you tend to either deny reality or go wandering off on some tangent. If not totally change the subject matter. When others get frustrated with the weaseling, you declare victory and go home. And you never, ever consider the likelihood that you might just be FOS. Which is usually the case.