Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Creative Labs (CREAF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CHIP HUNTER who wrote (5235)	10/30/1997 7:37:00 AM
From: Will Cunningham	Respond to of 13925

Good morning ghost chartist.

To: CHIP HUNTER who wrote (5235)	10/30/1997 9:17:00 AM
From: CJay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13925

Keep gloating about being right twice Chip--it is you right, even if it was a lucky coincidence with total market meltdown. You are right---there is no room for guessing---so tell us what you saw and what you see in the Creaf charts that makes it not a total guess on your part. To the extent you knew something and failed to share it, you did us all a disservice. After all, you had the benefit of others thoughts--whether or not you followed them. As far as personal attacks, noone ever did that, including me, until you kept refusing to explain your TA rationale. SO lets stop all this stuff---as I and many others have told you many times, if you just explain your rationale, we could all be friends. So what will it be? Otherwise, it should not surprise you that everyone feels irritated by your attitude.

To: CHIP HUNTER who wrote (5235)	10/30/1997 9:56:00 AM
From: CJay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13925

Chip: Your gloating started too early---as far as the second time being right, anyway. Despite big selloff on Nasdaq at open, Creaf only down about 1/4 point today, and only 1 pont total since your last short call (which was at 25 3/4-26, stock is at 25). Don't count your chickens yet, Chip. And guess what --other people do do their homework besides you---and they even share it with others, unlike a petulant schoolboy.

To: CHIP HUNTER who wrote (5235)	10/30/1997 11:16:00 AM
From: CJay	Respond to of 13925

Chip: Using your own words to hang you, you said TA does not change everyday (which is wrong) but if right, then why close short at 22 1/8 when you said previously that TA showed CREAF going down to 16--18 in a month? TA does not change, right? And you originally said you closed your short at 21 1/8---a price the stock never traded at--then said, oops---it was 22 1/8. Even if true, and you shorted originally at 26, the only way you could be ahead shorting CREAF during the entire last two weeks is if you sold out Tuesday morning during the two hours between when CREAF went from 22 to 26 1/4. Man, what a fortunate decision---to sell right at the bottom---but why do it IF TA DOES NOT CHANGE AND YOUR TARGET IS $16-18 NEXT MONTH!! Just wondering.

To: CHIP HUNTER who wrote (5235)	10/30/1997 12:13:00 PM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13925

Chip, nobody has attacked you because you are short CREAF. They have attacked you because you have been a pest, and have not added anything useful to the thread.

To: CHIP HUNTER who wrote (5235)	10/30/1997 8:56:00 PM
From: Ron Kline	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13925

Chip, I will give you credit for calling TLAB and CREAF. I would never have believed it would happen. Part of me still thinks you had the luck of the market moving down. We all know that if the market was going strong you would have covered and made no money IMO. But I was thinking that maybe your charting on these stocks was showing that the market was going to go down. So even though the fundamentals of these companies are good, your charting pointed that something was up, and it turns out that it was the market making a big move down that was the real reason for these stocks' drop. That's all I can reason for your TA really working. Sorry for all bad press I gave you. You deserve something for calling it correct. Luck or no luck you were pretty much right. Ron