Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (2894)	9/3/2009 3:33:39 PM
From: LLCF	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

<I grant you that Michael Jackson is more famous than Dawkins, Myers and the others discussed here. However Jackson isn't related to the topic of this thread.> LOL, none of this is! <I didn't refer to it as a journal. Its a magazine and its subject is science. > I don't care what you referred to it as... jounals have scientific studies in them, Scientic American does not. It's NOT a scientific journal. Further why would a scientist be needed to write in it? Why do non football announce NFL games? You seen perplexed by the simplest stuff that needs no explanation. A better Question would be: Why are Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter commenting on scientic information??? Why doesn't THAT alarm you... they have much more sway than thousands of Dawkins!! DAK