SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (9048)9/3/2009 5:09:48 PM
From: Peter Dierks2 Recommendations  Respond to of 42652
 
Ed Feulner on Healthcare: Your Must Read of the Day

Posted by Erick Erickson (Profile)

Thursday, September 3rd at 4:30PM EDT

No Comments
Having dinged Heritage a few weeks ago for severely muddying the water over the healthcare debate, you can’t imagine how happy I am to read the President of the Heritage Foundation bringing some much needed clarity to the issue and, thankfully, taking the mud out of the co-op issue.

The health care industry is worth $2.5 trillion a year, comparable with Britain’s entire gross domestic product and larger than that of most European countries. Can you imagine Britain’s entire economy being reordered by a few people working secretly in backrooms in a matter of weeks? What are the chances they could ever get that right?

But the American people cannot take all the credit for slowing down this train wreck. Some of it should go to White House communicators who came up with arguments that were ludicrous on their face, such as insisting that a public option would introduce “competition” into the health insurance market.

On the co-op issue? Feulner and I share the same position and he hits a homerun with this concise statement:

Renaming the public option a “co-op” is disingenuous, for example. It all amounts to the same thing: a single-payer system, which means the only choice Americans would have is a government package.

Exactly. Water un-muddied, the Bob Bennetts of the world, etc. need to now take a page from Ed Feulner’s book and just say no to what the Democrats are offering.

redstate.com



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (9048)9/21/2009 2:50:33 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
because it progressively would cut (yes, cut) the care for baby boomers in the future

If you consider a decrease in the projected increase to be a cut, and if your talking about government expenditure, then I think that is what we should do.