SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (25131)9/4/2009 11:16:45 PM
From: Bread Upon The Water  Respond to of 36918
 
I don't have much quarrel with anything you've said in terms of the science and scientific complexity involved--up to the limits of my understanding that is (excepting sun spot cycles and their effect which I know nothing about).

But leaving the realm of science and entering the realm of politics wherein science must get translated into the art of the possible--politically it seems we are going to have to live with the cap and trade approach for a while even while acknowledging it may not work and the better solution may be as you suggest.

It's an approach that business is willing to try and not adamantly oppose and that has worked in the USA as far as reducing the amount of acid rain that falls. The question here is whether even a comprehensive expanded cap and trade bill can make it thru congress.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (25131)9/7/2009 9:10:58 AM
From: Bread Upon The Water  Respond to of 36918
 
"The forces regarding CO2 are simple enough to understand. The combination result is the tricky part. "

Is this what could account for the differences in the modeling?