Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (71525)	9/4/2009 1:01:55 PM
From: MJ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224713

This needs more attention. Coincidental with the concern arising about Czars as I sort through old, old papers our English family kept-----there were old newspapers of WWI era. There is one full page on Czars--------I did a post on Politics for Pros ------here is the link. Message 25850250 SEE FULL MESSAGE BELOW: ALSO CHECK OUT THE MESSAGE ON "Politics for Pros" and follow the discussion on what I wrote and then other discussions about "Obama's Unelected Czars". IMO the use of Obama's Czars is his attempt to bypass Congress-------this is a real political slap in the face to Nancy Pelosi and her House as well as the Dems in the Senate. ___________________________________________________________ To: Gina Vener who wrote (310084) 8/9/2009 6:24:13 PM From: MJ 2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 322662 Regarding Czars Senator Byrd was right to raise the question of the use of the word Czar. I have been wondering off and on when and why Obama chose that designation? Now I am wondering even more------' I am clearing old boxes of papers and came across an envelope of WWI papers kept by someone in the family. On one full page is an on going story----"A Tale of Love, Mystery and the Great War"T" picturing a woman with a Red Cross insignia and a military man being treated----story to be continued next Sunday. (Believe this was a page from Bluefield, Virginia and West Virginia Paper) On the reverse is a full page title "The Last Moments of the Unhappy Czar Described by His Priest"----this is the story of the Trial and Execution of Nicholas Romanoff, How he was condemned without evidence and shot as told by Father John of the Uspensky Cathedral. Father John wrote this 20 years after the execution of Romanoff as Father John was with Romanoff in the last week before his execution. Yes, I am rambling----------but why the use of the word Czar by Obama. Senator Byrd certainly is correct-------the American Constitution has no place for CZARS. Obama needs to be called on this again. Senator Byrd is not long for this world------we need someone else to call him on this. The second question that arises----------have we ever had a President who used the term Czar? I think not. mj ____________________________________________________________ CONTINUATION ON THE PAGE ON ROMANOFF: I was curious enough that I read the full page as musty as it was------what was so poignant was that in his private time with Father John without the presence of the executioners, the Red Army, Romanoff told Father John that he never meant any harm to the people of Russia----he was well-intentioned. Alas, Romanoff was shot by a firing squad of about 20 executioners of The Red Army----rather gruesome. No doubt there were good Czars and bad Czars in Russia. However; in America, we have as Senator Byrd wrote-----a Constitution of the United States of America that does not utilize Czars as an unelected government. Senator Byrd in his dieing days has given the opinion of an expert and posed the question that must be asked and dealt with now before Obama destroys the foundations of this nation via unelected Czars. Who will pick up Senator Byrd's knowledge of the Constitution and Parliamentary Procedure and take his place? Who will stand up for Americans? No to Obama Czars mj