Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (2921)	9/5/2009 10:37:18 AM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

<The bogus issue is your claim that SA isn't a "scientific journal" as opposed to a science magazine. > Science "journals" have studies by "scientists"...screened and peer reviewed by other scientists.... a popular magazine about science has whatever the hell it wants... scientific or otherwise, period. You inability to grasp that concept is fine with me. <I do think its strange a non-scientist would have a column in a scientific magazine.> YOU COMPLETE NUMBSKULL!!!! It's NOT "scientific"... it's a magazine run by people that purports to write about science. They do WHAT EVER THE HELL THEY WANT. Your black helicopters are swarming around the wrong office building... quick, you're missing some evil doing accross the street!!! <No, he doesn't. > Yes he does... naaa naaaa naaa! In any case, it doesn't matter... as I stated above. DAK