Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (54641)	9/7/2009 10:55:19 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217711

nothing but imperial infighting wrapped in spin without realizing that truth will result in wrong watch n brief premise, and keep you well away from the trade of the century, that be gold that is why all subjects impacting the fundamental guiding watch n brief premise is a live subject for purpose of altruistic giving on this thread, to satisfy prime condition for reward, that one must give in order to receive youtube.com

To: pezz who wrote (54641)	9/8/2009 2:23:58 AM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217711

1945 to 2009 = 64 years + 20 years to adulthood = plenty of them are only 84 years old with another decade left to run. <As to Japan those who committed the atrocities are long dead> Get them now, better late than never. For younger war criminals, how about Lt Calley and co? en.wikipedia.org He is still there for the getting. I haven't heard that Vietnam has given him the all clear. It's good that the US Army was not happy for him to get off as he did: <The Army appealed against Judge Elliott's decision to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and asked an appeals judge to stay Calley's immediate release, which was granted. However, the full Court upheld the release pending appeal and decided the entire court would hear the appeal (normally not done in the first instance). The Army won a reversal of Judge Elliott's habeas corpus grant and a reinstatement of the judgment of the courts martial, with 5 judges dissenting. (Calley v. Callaway, 519 F.2d 184, 9/10/1975). In a long and extremely detailed careful opinion, the reviewing court disagreed with Judge Elliott on the law and significantly on Elliott's scope of review of the courts martial proceedings. The Court noted that although by now Calley had been "paroled" from confinement by the Army, that did not moot the habeas corpus proceedings. > Mqurice