Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CCEE Breaking Out -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Brustad who wrote (7499)	10/30/1997 9:54:00 AM
From: Dr. Moze	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12454

I agree we do get our money's worth with the CCEE "soap opera" and cast of mysterious characters. It would make a great novel of financial intrigue, with in-depth motivations and background activities of the various conspirators. As for Ingrid being a hypster, that is a real possibility. In her kindly fashion, she has presented more unsubstantiated information and propogated more bullish hopes here than anybody. If you read her posts (recent ones and earlier messages), you'll note that she has a subtle but very convincing style that certainly projects the image that she is "on our side" and has the insider track. Just her one post last month (I forget the message #) that revealed the Softowrks client as Citicorp, and that BT was a signed deal that would be bigger than expected, thus the delay, etc. Well. Why hasn't she offered one reference to verify the "public" knowledge that Citicorp has signed the major deal with Softworks? Why hasn't she "taken action" and "spilled the beans"/"pulled the rug out from under Danny's show" (whatever, quotes are approximate!) at this late date? And then she reappears once, to sound just as surprised and upset as the rest of us here about the proxy proposition for more dilution/reverse split. Seems to me that, IF INGRID WERE TO BE BELIEVED, the 'solid' information about "done deals" that she claims to possess would supercede any of this stuff and guarantee the company's success. So why the convenient (and quite fickle) change in attitude, "Ingrid"? Why haven't you returned to the thread and shared the meaty info that you have, as you stated you would earlier if "the Dannys" continued to drag their feet? It's the end of October, honey, so they have had their chance to "come clean." Why not let the cat out of the bag, ESPECIALLY if you are also disgusted with the games that CCEE mgmt. is playing? Let's hear from you with some real info, Ingrid. You "owe" us that only because you promised it. And you clearly don't "owe" CCEE mgmt. any favors, do you? (Remember, you told us that the Boys in Bohemia hate you.) I have certainly come around in my thinking of who has generated the most damage and deceit to the small investors on this thread. I'd love to have my beliefs changed, but I kinda doubt it will happen at this point. I love a good dose of real-life intrigue! $^)