SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (104911)9/9/2009 4:39:37 AM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
Since the FDIC and taxpayer are on the hook for bank losses, you have to decide whether it will be cheaper to have the FDIC take-over a bank and pay-off on the insurance, or play "let's pretend the bank is still solvent".

Paulson's game of let's have the taxpayer fund the bonuses of bankers who have destroyed their bank and bail-out their shareholders was indeed over the top.

But apart from those examples of loot the taxpayer, the question still remains which is the cheapest way to address the continuing years of losses ahead for the banks.
.



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (104911)9/9/2009 6:39:15 AM
From: ggersh1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
"what needs to happen is for the criminals to go to jail, the bad banks to go bust (and be replaced by responsible bankers - and no, the bushevicesque fraud tactics of we *need* goldman sachs more than they need us crap isn't gonna work) and we need a reset on which to begin organic growth."

You got it right, but to blame it squarely on Obama is wrong. This started long ago and Obama is here at the end game. IMO